Doesnt Cover Terror Attacks News Today

The president explicitly said, they dont cover it, and they had their reasoning, he never said that, sean spicer said, they go undercover, we dont report on them enough. >> thats not what the president said. >> he also had an insinuation that was vague enough, people could read in what they wanted, the reporters, media have some kind of agenda behind this. i have been covering the news for 20 years, i was down at ground zero for literally years after the attacks, we have covered terrorist attack...

Domestic level, and i think cnn is one of the only u.s. networks that will cover that where you can get that, you wont get that from other networks, if theres an attack that happens in another part of the world, if you are tuning in, mr. president to cnn international, you will get those stories as well. we dont just cover stories that happen here in the united states. >> don, i think what also happened here, you had a president who spoke and then you had a white house staff that had to be the s...

Is troubling, especially when doing it before a military audience as he did yesterday. >> but as a tactic to get the media doing that, saying things like he said yesterday in front of the media saying the media doesnt cover terror attacks which is completely false and were talking about that and not about this travel ban likely going to the supreme court? >> its a distraction. its a tactic. its a strategy, and i dont think i can say it enough. it will be hard to sustain because at some point he ...

It really says basically, that the press is not doing its job, because it has its own political agenda, it doesnt want you to know the truth about how dangerous terrorism is. its pulling a leftist agenda on you, which is clearly not true, and he engages in these falsehoods without producing any serious evidence, we get a list that includes san bernardino. its astonishing, and its beneath the dignity of the presidency and it really tears at the fabric of what holds us together as a people, when w...

Ignoring terrorist attacks, it doesnt explain why. it feels like you said, perhaps theyre trying to wave that shiny object and get the publics attention away from the things they should be focused on. >> lets hope it does not happen. the men and women he spoke to today put their lives on the line for those terrorist attacks and there are journalists in the front lines as well. pamela brown, do you have a response to this? >> im talking about those terrorist attacks jim pointed out. i spent sleep...

Its baffling, they mention the paris attacks, the san bernardino california attacks. the orlando nightclub attack. its odd theyre say iing these attacks were not covered enough. we spent days on end reporting about them. they were only able to compile this list because of the news media. if we didnt report on them, they wouldnt have been able to make the list. the only thing that seems to change is the setting where hes delivering the remarks from. >> i think its pretty simple that maybe for som...

Youve gone from one bad move, banning seven countries by ambush with no real process to another bad move, tweet attacking a judge, which is completely unpresidential, to another bad move, saying the media doesnt cover terror attacks, which we do. and on and on. the bans like this banana peel. you keep slipping on and slipping on. that is not going to work. a pattern of mistakes like this could consume your whole presidency. you got to stop it. now, for the liberals, heres your messy truth. your ...