Doesnt Stop Things News Today

Mudd. the media perspective is this, phil, they want to keep some information hidden. you learn about things you would not learn about otherwise. what is the other side when it comes to intel? >> chris, are you correct, but in half the cases. when we see embarrassment is not a national security leak. lets give you a definition of a national security leak. when adversary gains advantage. in this case, it did. somebody in the u.s. government decided "the new york times" should know what the brits ...

The politician tell another one. lets get into it. republican congress member michael burgess is the chairman of the health and sub committee on health and also a medical doctor. congress member, always good to have you. bernie sanders from vermont. stiff criticism of the bill as confirmed by the cbo. here is what he said. i want to give you a chance to respond. >> we can call this legislation whatever we want. you can call it a destroy health care bill. you can call it a tax break for the rich ...

Story. of course, the senate side of the story. we can talk about that as well. even after the bill is signed into law, it doesnt stop things. things will continue. they will have sub committee and we consider lots of legislation. we are working on a big fda bill. we did a markup in committee last week. we will do another markup in full committee next week. we will have that continually through this year and next year. i would wager some time. a lot of people are concerned i did not repeal enoug...

You may not believe that scenario, i saw terrorists do stupid things like they assume they had more time. when you see the word leak, you differentiate embarrassing and what gives the adversary the advantage. that is why the british are angry today. >> david, phil lays out the case from the intel side. these are not things that are shocking bombshells in the u.s. press. we often know the name of the bomber or we have pictures of evidence. these are things that british authorities will no longer ...

Executive and how can we tell when someone comes into the room with their hair on fire whether they are chicken little or cassandr isnt that corre cassandra? >> whats the answer? >> there are things that happen in every case. if the thing you are warning about has never happened before, people will not believe it. if the thing you are warning about has been a hollywood movie, asteroids coming to the earth. biological weapons killing everybody. that sort of thing. it is outlandish in the eyes of ...

Story, theres a reason its classified. its because it threatens the safety of the united states and there are sources and methods that are being protected. i think that we shouldnt be applauding the leaks of classified information. i think the president is right to call this out as a major concern. and i think that youve seen people on both sides of the aisle who have been involved in this world to call that out, that it is concerning when we have classified information and sources that are bein...

About the feuds. we ask questions about those things. but i mean in many ways these are important people in the white house. weve got the presidents two top aides seemingly having disagreements and we dont know the extent of it and whether its just an ordinary course of business, two people with two different ideologies or if its something more. >> well, i think from a process standpoint, whether or not someone is getting along or not getting along or whether or not one idea is getting floated o...

Getting a monolithic group of advice that says you only should do this. he gets a lot of opinions and ideas and policy shifts that helpuide h ultimate decision-making. thats a very healthy thing. and i think that what we bring together is a lot of really talented individuals, whether its mick mulvaney and his service and his understand of the budget process or steves understandings of the policies or jareds business acumen, theres a lot of things that are being done to help improve the governmen...

Fleischer last night who we just saw at the museum and he knows better than anybody what its like to be behind that podium. he says he thinks that spicer may have saved his job with that apology which they dont do very often. do you think so? >> i think if he had not apologized, had not come out and explained what he meant and make some amends that he would be under really serious fire this morning. >> calm some of the critics? >> i think it was necessary. well see if its sufficient. because thi...

Nit-picking the statement is just ridiculous. does the white house have a problem here? >> i think sean spicer did the right thing yesterday by doing two things. not only did he apologize profusely that seemed to be very, very sincere and he also called sheldon adelson. >> what was that? for people who dont know, huge donor. >> supporter of donald trump. my thinking is the president probably speaks to mr. adelson pretty often so going right to him and apologizing is a good barometer to see how h...