Dont Overlap News Today

Have a professional history. He didnt need to mention everyone agrees. Mueller in the letter the way he the manner in which theyre in a did. Box is they have to decide if mueller finished tonight. Did you see any evidence, clues, the crime of Obstruction Of Justice and Witness Tampering anything like that because youve been on the ground . And others, if thats still illegal. If they still think its a crime. I think the letter codified the Personality Traits we have already seen from this new Att...

The counter intelligence investigation is more than a flashing yellow light for the administration and congress. wlosh to say what we know what the what the reasoning behind it is. its unclear whether mueller is politics are right now is going go into an analysis of the ludicrous. until we know how the questions were answered, bob mueller had law and whether or not does he feel that all of the elements of access to in the just all the obstruction of justice were met. >> so im going to say this i...

Under state law hes weve already been charged for under federal law. >> typically if you have two different sovereigns, federal and state, theres no double jeopardy. but new york has this double jeopardy clause. it seems theyve very carefully selected charges that dont overlap the law. look for manaforts lawurate to file a challenge. >> different matters. >> well, thaw are different matters but what will matter more is if tlirlts same facts and charges. theres no federal crime or explicit krum o...

Innovation. when it was a tn & t and t mobile, i understand why they were would block that. when there are less service providers in one industry, they can charge you more. with at&t and time warner, youre creating a multifaceted conglomerate a la comcast and nbc, a broad range business. thats not the same. how can they make this higher bills argument? >> yes, its an interesting argument. people have pushed back saying this would be a vertical merger. saying it wouldnt necessarily -- these are t...

Or how do you interpret that? >> it seems to be some kind of equivalence. i think its important that the united states always maintain the high moral ground. and i actually believe what bill oreilly said, that putin is a killer. theres no upside in terms of the united states, in terms of putins interests. hell do as much as he can to destabilize us, to reassert the great power status that he thinks russia is, deserves, and hell do everything he possibly can to get in our way. our interests just ...

President. president obama changed that. and i just think that from a standpoint of focus, priority, inclusion if you will, in all the key meetings, that that change was a very healthy change. >> that the joint chairman and chiefs should be on it as well as the director of intelligence. >> right. >> i appreciate the opportunity to read your op ed. >> we have much in our next hour. the ninth circuit court of appeals will be holding hearings on trumps travel ban. well talk about that and more ahea...

Our interests just from that standpoint dont overlap. i think we need to have a relationship with him, whether its political or diplomatic, and we need to have a relationship from a position of strength. so in terms of, again, that moral equivalence, i thought the statement was pretty appalling. >> i want to ask you about president trump naming steve bannon. you said president has the right to shape the security council as he sees fit, but partisan politics has no place at the table and neither ...

Well as the director of national intelligence, actually, when the bush administration came in, the director of national intelligence didnt exist. and thats the way it was initially in terms of the chairman of the joint chiefs being an advisor to the president and not a specified member of the council. president obama changed that. and i just think that from a standpoint of focus, priority, inclusion if you will, in all the key meetings, that that change was a very healthy change. >> that the joi...

Sequence. now if it came to the position of trying to achieve those two objectives, a political transition and the fight against extremism in parallel, then i think our interests would have some overlap and whenever you have overlapping interests, you have the possibility of cooperating. so i hope we get to that point. but that would require a change from this current position, which is as i said yu not logical t. two pieces dont overlap. >> mr. secretary, do you see -- >> mr. secretary, going b...

Is a stock forstock merger. a number of our shareholders have encouraged us to do this. they are well aware of the fact we dont overlap and that these products on we are able to bring to all of the markets and to go into markets that are new markets like interactive advertising and digital advertising, where advertisers want more of a national footprint and, as i said, all of the other products, in digital and in satellite and in telecommunications, the companies are available everywhere. and it...