0 david, i m looking at this thing historically. there have been periods in our history, where one party, it has been the republican party since world war ii, that s tried to make its bones if you want to use mafia language, make its bones by attacking the other party. they got in after 20 years or so of the new deal and fair deal in 1946. all they did was hold hearings. hearings, hearings, hearings. they said they used to open the day with a prayer, end it with a probe. it never ever ended. and it ended up being kicked out in two years. darrell issa must have had no knowledge of history. here he is trying to imitate that period of congress with huack hearings. in 1998 they tried to do it with clinton. they seem to have nothing in their gun except negativity. your thoughts. what are they doing? why are they repeating the negative past that got them nowhere? they re doing it because i think they re playing to their base, chris. i think that they re you know, my view of the republica
0 we got closer to the actual testimony. back in washington, back in washington, and then in washington, things start to get nervous- making for the administration. former commissioner s many authorized visits to the white house campus and a closer direction and that is lois lerner fifth taking and democratic organizations and it gets one step closer to the orbit of the house of obama. political? white house administrative? anything. all we are looking for is where the lines crossed and people who might have been part of directing and authorizing and allowing it to go forward, where do their paths cross with senior obama officials? this led to a dust up on the sunday talk she with darril darril issa is doing in 1972 and tells me that the anger stems from fear. issa is not ideal with the republican when he uses hot words like liar, that s not a good thing to do. they will not cut. it they will need more than character assassination. and when you respond in time it doesn t elevate your o
operation. it was known to many people in the community and it extended through his other brother, randy, in the 1990s. we thought this reflected on the family and material given the family s political stand on drug trade in toronto. doug has been a leading advocate of greater police efforts to stamp out the drug trade in toronto. we thought it was important for the people of toronto to know his own background. what has been the reaction among some of the public, i understand, has been a little bit of a backlash against your paper in some corners. absolutely. it s exploded. a good number of people in toronto and well beyond who are outraged that we would rely on anonymous sources. they ve raised questions, as you did, about the relevance of something that happened a number of decades ago. and there s an equal, if not
something sounds really suspicious and some media outlets jump on it, a little too quickly at times. this is one of the liabilities of our 24/7 cycle and one of the more famous cases is poor shirley sharrod. decided to write one snippet of a tape and it ruined her career and got her fired. this was not inaccurate but the spin was. deborah saunders, at the same time, the administration didn t immediately clarify what those visits were for, but was this a little too overheated in suggesting, insinuating, implying that it was reinvolved in the white house complex. the atlantic had written that he was approved for visits through security. you don t always go, even if you ve been cleared by secret service. that s correct. but, you know, let me just say mr. shulman, you should check things out.
website daily call reporting the other day that doug shulman had visited the white house 157 times over four years during the obama administration more than any other cabinet officers and writing strongly suggest coordination by white house officials in the campaign against president s political opponents. that spawned a number of television segments like this one. an investigation by the daily caller said the scandal has deeper ties to the white house than we originally thought. here s why. according to the report, publicly released records show that embattled commissioner douglas shulman visited the white house at least 157 times during the obama administration. more recorded visits than even the most trusted members of the president s cabinet. they were for, by in large, meetings on obama care. so, in a scandal sometimes