Extremely dependent on transportation and the Community Organizations that serve those folks have very independent work force. They cant remember the people that work in Affordable Housing also need to get where they need to go. We understand the point of view from but a technical perspective. The ta has done a great job to at least come up with a conceptual level to adequately in and they laid out a very nice game plan for you. A couple things i would point out is the communities of concern is a device full to focus equity. I would point out, remember transit dependent communities are not always low income communities and we need to think about both of them. And we have entrance the dependent needs across the city, some based on low income and some based on the fact they dont own cars and second i want to make a point about the previous presentation about the vlf is very impressive work. This is on both ends of service and infrastructure is not mutually independent. You have to invest
Are and monitoring the investment proposals for on going process to lengthen, determine the relationships between the proposed investment, monitoring outcomes over time to see whether gaps are closing and then updating it every few years as needs change. And then of course stakeholder outreach needs to be part of each step of this. Just want to close with a couple thoughts on how to first of all make sure that the benefits of the Investment Program are distributed equitably and monitoring to make sure that impacts are also distributed equitably. There are a couple models that we could look to for making sure that benefits are distributed equitably. There is the cap and trade program as an example which sets aside a certain percentage of any given line item to communities of concern. Thats one thing we can look to. We could prioritize investment towards communities of concern until certain performance targets are reached. And then on the distribution of impact side as we are monitoring
Blvd, but there is no money there for light rail which is grandfathered from prop b into prop k years ago. To your homework and look at what is in prop b and prop k and look at what has to be done and what has been done and you have to go before the voters again to authorize the money in prop k to complete the project in the sales tax now before we look 30 years in the future. Thank you. Steve wu from chinatown cdc. I want to thank the ta staff for a great presentation and laying out a great framework for how to achieve equity in discussions about new transportation revenue. I think its very important as a board you take a step back and really examine how the revenue being discussed today is being reprogrammed especially with regard to equity. And its very important to take a look at how new monies will benefit todays everyday transit riders. We havent seen any analysis of that and i think this lays out a framework of handout you how to do that. How new money can benefit transit riders
Its very important as a board you take a step back and really examine how the revenue being discussed today is being reprogrammed especially with regard to equity. And its very important to take a look at how new monies will benefit todays everyday transit riders. We havent seen any analysis of that and i think this lays out a framework of handout you how to do that. How new money can benefit transit riders. We look forward to seeing how this framework gets developed and once again, thank the ta staff for producing a great presentation. Steve, i just wanted to clarify at the last ta Board Meeting that malcolm was anna pointed member of the task force but you said he was never a ppointed . We dont want to elaborate on that. He was on a communication band and he raised a lot of concerns which he felt were not adequately addressed. He was a member of the task force, he was not able to attend many of the meetings. Thank you. Next speaker . Good afternoon, bob allen from urban habitat. I wa
Questions because we should move on to the Equity Analysis. Thank you. Thank you. Let me ask if commissioner avalos has any comments. Thank you chair mar. I appreciate you bringing this item forward. To me i think its best we continue this item to see what is being proposed out of the Transportation Task force 2030. I believe there could be very different scenarios coming out of that and compare what the recommendations are there in the months to company. I think that effort is gearing up towards the november 2014 ballot and i think it would be important to have an on going dialogue about how we shape our investments on we approve the ballot. I should have called item 6 and 7 together because of so much overlap. Im wondering if we can call no. 7 at this point. The clerk item 7 proposed approach to Equity Analysis of the mayors 2030 Transportation Task force draft expenditure plan information enclosure a enclosure b at the october 22, 2013 meeting of the Transportation Authority board,