Epic Statute News Today

Be there may be elephants here, but they are not just in the covered jurisdictions. impeerically, we can show the elephants are more likely in the covered jurisdictions than uncovered. addition nally, the statute itself gives a bailout prediction that allows them that have a clean nose to opt out. >> and the bail in. >> it goes both waits, right. >> if a jurisdiction isnt covered, it can get put in. we update, basically, the data base and look at the law every few years. it sunsets. not just 98 ...

Unfortunately, in 2004, arizona passed a law that added its own requirements requiring proof of citizenship in addition and above to those from the federal form. they thought that wasnt enough. they wanted more. and we, of course, objected on behalf of our clients because this placed a special burden on people in arizona versus the burdens placed on people in other states. its unlawful, unconstitutional and contrary to the intent of a statute and federal law should preimpt a state law. they knew...

Its clearly section five because it doesnt require -- second two prohibits discrimination but requires somebody to bring a case. section five puts on ownous on the discriminator themselves. >> theres no other statute wu apply this standard. we dont say because people are aware of gender discrimination. the law certainly has made it better. there has been progress. we have admitted it. the court admitted it. everyones admitted theres progress. theres still a need. its what congress focused on in ...