Id like to ask a question regarding private citizens purchasing a highquality drones and who happens to have some evil intent out there regardless of rules or regulations. Armed with a chemical agent, and flies it over populations, targeted populations, with intent to create massive havoc. What rules or regulations are out there from permitting for permitting that situation to develop . Guest well, robert, again, if someone wants to do or has bad intentions or has the intent to do something of harm, this is a technology that, if misused, can cause ill effects. But that is true with anything that we have from a technology standpoint. Thats why i say you have to hold people accountable for that. You can do that with a maintained system just as well or easy. But that opportunity prevent it. We have seen incidents happen in this country, hacked numerous times and we have to hold those people accountable. This Technology Well also help will also help us to protect ourselves by being able to
Applicable to antiterrorism methods, i dont know. I think all of these models are heavily data driven. So one would need a lot of data. But to the point that these models, these predictive modelling are able to predict things that may relate indirectly to terrorism or criminal activities, the systems are suggesting that we are going that way. Other thoughts on that question . Theres a system in chicago that the Chicago Police department has deployed which both has been touted and criticized, but it does somewhat the neighborhood or block level predictive deprediction bs as to criminal activity as well as i understand individual level identifying people who may be either victims of crimes or perpetrators of crimes. Again, both touted and highly criticized. Any thoughts or comments . One quick one creating a feedback loop. You see every crime that occurs on corner acts and draw an overdrawn example that you thought it was real dangerous. Thats the main one from my perspective. So this is
Protected. Fourth amendment, mike, you talked about the balance between government requests and your customers privacy, do you think the government should have a warrant every time it accesses your customers records . Particularly if theyre american customers. Yeah. Certainly in the Law Enforcement context weve advocated for a reform of that that would in effect require a warrant for access to any content regardless of the age to precise location information, other sensitive data. You know, im not sure we gould so far to say that a warrant is required for every single case for every single data type. We certainly need to update the rules so that there is appropriate judicial review of surveillance programs and specific requests that we get for data. In terms of thirdparty doctrine, would you then essentially not have it be an absolute exception to the Fourth Amendment but essentially where would grow with it to provide some protection but not necessarily a full warrant protection . Yea
Congress. For example, the usa freedom act and similar initiatives. You have as part of that also the proposal to create an advocate of some kind,e. Here again, an attempt to influence or affect what are the rules that the intelligence agencies are expected to follow. And then a different part of that question is, what oversight mechani mechanisms, what assurances do we have that the agencies are following the rules . And you are part of that. I mentioned the congressional committees, and then all the layers within the executive blanche itself. So i think i hope that the public discussion has been shifting a bit from whether or not were following the rules i think what i perceived in the public discussion is a greater acceptance that where he in fact trying our best to follow the rules. Were not perfect and we make mistakes. But were trying to follow the rules as best we can. And now that the discussion has been shifting to what should those rules be . What are the rules . And what sho
You can make a comment on our facebook page. And finally, send an email. The president will be holding a News Conference this afternoon at 1 30 pm eastern time. It will be live on cspan. Obviously, this will be one of the areas he addresses. The front page of the wall street journal this morning for response ggles to hack. The u. S. Government is looking retaliate to north hacking of arent Sony Pictures, according to familiar with discussions u. S. Officials have evidence that could point to north korea as directing the attack. Officials are still investigating who is responsible. North korea has denied responsibility. One of the coauthors of this story is Devlin Barrett of the wall street journal. Mister barrett, how close is the u. S. White house to naming korea government is responsible . Guest they are pretty close. I think it will name her later today, and it would be pretty awkward if you didnt answer that question today he ddidnt answer that question today. So much of this has h