Felt Aggrieved News Today

real frenzy of activity around this case. so, i promise we will return to that as soon as we have it. lets turn our attentions to the united states. the house of representatives has approved a deal to allow the us to borrow more money, days before the worlds biggest economy would have started defaulting on its debt. the measure passed the chamber by a vote of 314 to 117, with defections on both sides of the aisle. the us senate must vote on the bill later this week before presidentjoe ...

>> i believe my plan is responsible is fair. it focuses the benefit on middle-class and working families. >> so will it help or hurt the president and democrats politically? today opinion sharply divided. >> i voted for the president specifically for this issue. $20,000 for pell recipients would be a major victory. >> i just feel its a little slap in the face to those who worked hard to pay it off. >> also today restrictive abortion bans taking effect in oklahoma, tennessee and texas. ...

Cuts. you will remember that a month ago, the party itself passed a bill in congress calling for $4.8 trillion worth of spending cuts over the ten year period. this deal only puts those spending cuts at about 1.5 trillion, and they are mostly related to freezing spending. ratherthan are mostly related to freezing spending. rather than really carving out some of the more significant cash that is spent every year by the us government. so, this will be a hard victory for mccarthy himself to boast a...

Confirmation would give america a win that last s a generation. >> it really had touched off a fire in the grassroots of conservatives who felt aggrieved by what was happening to kavanaugh. but i think the fact that brett kavanaugh has been confirmed means that the balance of grievance now shifts to democrats. republicans got what they wanted, conservatives got what they wanted by adding kavanaugh to the bench, and now the question is, do democrats who are already fired up going into this electi...

>> i think the law was set up in michigan so that if somebody felt aggrieved, if they thought there was some kind of fraud, we havent had one case of fraud reported yet but if they thought there were fraud or they were aggrieved, the taxpayer subsidize the recounts. over a buck a ballot, we will call it, is what it costs to recount. michigan had 4.8 million voters so we are talking about a $5 million fee if you use the wisconsin model and the person that would request sarich a recount would pay ...