Field Won News Today

Mostly negative. now, we have taken out the small proportion of neutral reports and negative in red and positive in green, the company found that two-thirds negative coverage tore trump, for bush, for marco rubio and ben carson doing the worst at 79 percent negative. now, check out the sudden shift after the debate on thursday and friday, ben carson and donald trump leading in media attention at 30 percent each, which is a significant drop for the donald and a sizable upfor the doctor but marco ...

Nothing. in the end the greatest loss was for the american public who did not learn anything about the candidate policies or ideas. >> f took heat after the debate, and i argue those questions were more on substance than most but, joe, were ted cruz and marco rubio and donald trump justified in complaining about what donald trump called nasty questions and then pivoting to rip the mainstream media? >> absolutely. i dont even understand some of the criticism because it was is clearly bias that it...

Basically slim to none. i think in the end the greatest lot was for the american electorate who didnt learn anything about the candidates policies or ideas. >> fox took some heat after its debate. i would argue those sequels were more on substance than many of the cnbc questions, but were they justified in complaining what trump called nasty questions, and then pivoting to rip the mainstream media? >> absolutely. i mean, absolutely. i dont even understand some of the criticism. it was so clearly...

Basically slim to none. i think in the end the greatest lot was for the american electorate who didnt learn anything about the candidates policies or ideas. >> fox took some heat after its debate. i would argue those sequels were more on substance than many of the cnbc questions, but were they justified in complaining what trump called nasty questions, and then pivoting to rip the mainstream media? >> absolutely. i mean, absolutely. i dont even understand some of the criticism. it was so clearly...