Fiona Philipp News Today

In the much-anticipated decision of Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC [2023] UKSC 25 (the “Decision”), the UK Supreme Court (the “Court”) rejected the contention that Barclays Bank UK Plc...

The Court held that banks do not owe this duty to customers deceived into instructing their banks to transfer money to fraudsters. On 12 July 2023, the UK Supreme Court...

The Supreme Court said it was not the banks responsibility to concern itself with the wisdom or risks of its customers payment decisions.

Barclays on Wednesday won a UK Supreme Court appeal that turned on the extent of banks' duties to protect customers from fraudsters, in a closely watched

Barclays on Wednesday won a closely-watched appeal at the United Kingdoms Supreme Court over banks duties to their customers to prevent them being defrauded. The British bank was sued...

While the customer at the heart of the ruling lost out in one area of her complaint, she won permission to pursue an alternative case against Barclays.

Banks cannot be held responsible for fraudulent payments that are authorised by customers themselves, the Supreme Court has ruled.

On Wednesday, 12 July 2023, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Fiona Philipp v Barclays Bank UK Plc. In what is a blow to consumers and a…

The Supreme Court said it was not the banks responsibility to concern itself with the wisdom or risks of its customers payment decisions.

An appeals court ruled on Monday that banks could be liable if they fail to protect individual customers against push payment fraud, extending the scope of a key legal obligation in a lawsuit against Barclays over a £700,000 ($913,000) scam.