Firing Battery News Today

An independent rocket launcher. it wasnt moving with guidance capability, it wasnt moving with other mrls, it was problemably a reinforcement joining up to an existing, what we call a firing battery. so it was a reinforcement. yeah, coming in in this direction to reinforce thats taking place in kharkiv. >> can you tell us -- look, here we are on day five of this invasion, and were still here. ukraine is still in this fight. were still talking about it. where are russian forces succeeding, where ...

Space, issue a warning, and then he still reserves the right to do something in the future whether its in the near future or further down the road. >> again, we are pressing the white house for some kind of response or explanation as to what happened. general, what would the likely targets be here for a strike like this? and how logistically complicated is it or what are the logistics for turning something like this around? >> to turn it around is simply stop what youre doing. reverse course. ev...

Capabilities that would give the iranians alert or pause or concern theres something else we were going to try to do. so very limited strike. >> general marks, thats a limited strike that would be on iranian territory. the firing battery would be inside irans borders here and when you put that together with, listen, this is the largest drone in the u.s. arsenal, he has no pilot in front here but as you said $150 million, we looked to see if there was a precedent for shooting down a drone this si...

President said about iran, quote, if they do anything they will suffer greatly. now we hear from centcom as barbara just reported this was an unprovoked attack on an u.s. asset. so what are the range of options, what is proportionate response to this? >> well, clearly the united states never takes options off the table, and they have a host of things they could do. i would think within reason the united states could conduct a very limited, very precise strike against the firing battery that was ...

Pompeo. i would say hes probably not as hawkish but is moving in a definitive way. but the united states gains nothing by trying to conduct a war against iran. we have a very checkered past in terms of trying to conduct regime change. but i think if we take a step back, what is the strategy? im not certain, and i think we could agree that the strategy is not clear. is the united states simply trying to poke tehran to poke tehran or are we trying to decrease their ability to try to acquire nuclea...