Firm Involvement News Today

And regarding the things with the new members. Frankly i think asking a question what good is it going to do to do this is rather transparent, but what its supposed to do is get people to follow the law. They all have a responsibility. They all know what the law s they have done it for a dozen years yet we repeatedly get in situations like this. He was denied due process because he was denied the records he needed to present his case at various points, whether it was at the Sunshine Ordinance Ta...

Constitution of the United States and that of the state of california and all of the laws that come there from thats a big responsibility and you cant come back later and say well, because i didnt directly handle this request im not responsible is just a complete denial of anything you know about proper management and acceptance of responsibility. And now we find out that mr. Rahaim has a direct report, the individual who was responsible to see that all those other people answer this request pro...

Myself at the commission and within our firm i would have no involvement at all. Is that under normal circumstances but simply because youre on the Arts Commission . Its actually because of normality circumstances. There are three of us actually four of us responsible for the Design Projects at the firm. We divide the work up among ourselves and each of us functions independently. Were not aware of frankly were busy and not paying attention to what the other ones are doing. Other than at operati...

Interfered with the course of justice and thats what the Planning Department did and i have no reason to believe that they are so ignorant of what they do that they didnt realize that was exactly what they were doing. Now as far as finding mr. Rahaim responsible he is responsible. No ifs, ands or buts. If youre the head of the department and accept 200,000, whatever salary you get plus another 40 in benefits and take an oath in defend the constitution of the United States and that of the state o...

Have sufficient judgment there, but yes. And in terms of the sfo project what role if any would you have in that . Again because of the situation i would have recuse myself at the commission and within our firm i would have no involvement at all. Is that under normal circumstances but simply because youre on the Arts Commission . Its actually because of normality circumstances. There are three of us actually four of us responsible for the Design Projects at the firm. We divide the work up among ...

Tonight to recommend that a public hearing on mr. Pilpels sia violation be expedited and put on your next commission meeting. Any other Public Comment . Commissioners, directors of San Francisco and [inaudible] open government and i would like to say will. Back to my general comment and regarding the things with the new members. Frankly i think asking a question what good is it going to do to do this is rather transparent, but what its supposed to do is get people to follow the law. They all hav...

Typically at the Arts Commission for a recusal the commissioner steps out of the room completely so theyre not present during the discussion. Does another architect stand in for an architect that recuses themselves . No. Does that put the Arts Commission at a disadvantage because of the recusal of that architect . Well, i think part of the reason why we have five is that should a recusal is necessary we have sufficient judgment there, but yes. And in terms of the sfo project what role if any wou...

Mr. Rahaim responsible he is responsible. No ifs, ands or buts. If youre the head of the department and accept 200,000, whatever salary you get plus another 40 in benefits and take an oath in defend the constitution of the United States and that of the state of california and all of the laws that come there from thats a big responsibility and you cant come back later and say well, because i didnt directly handle this request im not responsible is just a complete denial of anything you know about...

The amount exceeds 10,000. The attachments were waiver request from mr. Chow. Letter from tom decaigny and jd beltran, 2023, 2014 and text memo and draft resolution and i believe also added to that was an email from the Mayors Office in support of the requested waivers. Is mr. Chow here . Come forward. Good evening. Good evening commissioners. I am wondering if you could state the reasons why you believe we should grant this waiver of the section 3. 222 . Certainly. Let me begin by saying that i...

Come back later and say well, because i didnt directly handle this request im not responsible is just a complete denial of anything you know about proper management and acceptance of responsibility. And now we find out that mr. Rahaim has a direct report, the individual who was responsible to see that all those other people answer this request properly. And do any of you honestly believe that throughout this entire process from beginning to end mr. Rahaim was not kept informed of everything goin...