First Amendment Protective Activity News Today

And dr. Anthony fauci. Arrested . [music] a fox news alert for the Biden Justice to permit just brought criminal charges against donald trump. His political opponent for the third time in four months. This time the charges relate to january 6. Good evening. Today, an indictment was unsealed. Charging Donald J Trump with conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. The indictment was issued by a gra...

Committee itself. it is a rehashing of a bunch of first amendment protective activity, describing things the president said and did, drawing conclusions and pushing forward with a legal claim against legal counts against donald trump, saying that he violated a criminal law because he questioned the outcome of an election. because he questioned different things a lot of americans also have questions about. we also be in a situation now where political speech is being criminally prosecuted, at the...

Advertising things that were fda approved and that ultimately that gave information only to doctors who then independently wrote prescriptions. there is a legal challenge here. its interesting that opening statement that were reducing all of our trials to a johnny cochran type, if you over supply, people will die. we need thoehold defendants to higher standard of causation. >> thats so clear. thank you very much. coming up, abortion showdown. talk about legal cases. what could the supreme cour...

Opiates have a health benefit. it may be outweighed in the future by the risk of abuse but the question here is did the marketing campaign by the drug manufacturer cause, make, result in these doctors writing the scripts that resulted in this addiction. its a novel application of a public nuisance theory of liability and while the pharmaceutical company should be very concerned, at the same time they have a pretty good legal argument. >> do they have to establish that the drug companies misled o...

Individualized particularized vetting. which is what all national security experts say. look at threats, not groups of people. so thats what wed like to see. >> look at threats, not groups of people, what vetting would you need to see in place? if theyre asking a series of questions at the airport, what will those series of questions need to be? >> i think you wouldnt to want necessarily get into first amendment protective activity, but i think national security experts know how to do that type ...