investigators who investigated the ties between the trump campaign and russia and beyond. as new york times reports today, durham delivered a report that scolds the fbi but fails to live up to the expectations of supporters of donald j. trump that he would uncover a politically motivated deep state conspiracy. he charged no high-level fbi or intelligence official with a crime and acknowledged in a footnote that hillary clinton s 2016 presidential campaign did nothing prosecutable either. to no one s surprise though, the disgraced ex-president and his allies have used it as evidence of their priors and what amounts effectively to a campaign of disinformation. once again from the new york times, predictably the reporter s actual content, it contained no major new revelations and it accused the fbi of confirmation bias rather than making a more explosive conclusion of political bias, made scant difference in parts of the political arena. mr. trump and many of his loyalists iss
appears to be something that gives legitimacy to the claims that the fbi was involved in some sort of witch hunt so that it can provide talking points to the right, which is what they re doing. but if you look at what is in the report itself there s nothing new. in fact, i think it tells a story of the fbi doing exactly what they should have done. now, maybe they made some missteps along the way. they certainly had some peter strzok and lisa paige saying things out of school that were incredibly inappropriate. but when you look at the information they had, it would have been a dereliction of duty not to investigate russia. like so many things in the trump administration it is all about whose side you are on. it is all about us versus them. what this should have been is about an investigation into russia. it is not about, you know, trump or hillary or whoever. it was russia that interfered with our election. now, robert mueller concludes donald trump welcomed the help instead of repor
Transcripts for MSNBC Deadline White House 20240604 21:01:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
to position this as a moderate ban. it is not. that is why it s important to point out the fact you have to go back three times, 72 hours to meet with the doctor before you get the procedure. you can t call that moderate because if you do, the center begins to shift. to be continued. cecile richards, barbara mcquade, elicia, thanks for being at the table. thanks for your great reporting. barb will be elicia s guest this weekend. co-hosts from the sister-in-laws podcast. don t miss that saturday 6:00 p.m. on msnbc. will joyce s chickens be there? people are so happy about it on the twitter. on the twitter. i love it. still to come, the dangerous new reality of ai, artificial intelligence, as it is known, and why everyone should be paying close attention. we ll have that conversation and go there next.
injecting ai at this moment? my concern is extremely high, but i don t agree we can t put it back in the bottle. all of you would be smoking cigarettes right now if it weren t for the actions of regulators and trial lawyers and everybody else. we are an open and democratic society who has the potential to do so. this is coders making software. obviously, yes, it s moving faster than we have ever seen before. but you re also seeing smart people figuing out how to push back on some of these things. the idea of deepfakes, last month lawyers for elon musk tried to argue that he shouldn t have to give a deposition because he s such a famous person that his past statements might in fact just be deepfakes. it s one of those arguments we ve all been waiting for, people will say they ll use deepfakes not to just fake real