Footnote 8 News Today

Accountable. In their motion for a protective order, the Justice Department says, quote, such a protective order is needed in this case the because the defendant has released statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys and other associates in legal matters pending against him. In recent days the defendant has issued multiple posts, either specifically or by implication including the following which the defendant posted just hours ago. If you go after me, im coming after you...

End of the day that the statute is relevant to the ultimate legality. at this stage when the question is just whether it should be on hold, i think its not right to criticize the ninth circuit for focusing on the potential for harm as opposed to the ultimate answer on the merits. >> steve, lets go ahead and look at the merits of this executive order because the president says hes on strong standing, strong footing for supporting the merits of it. and this is from the appeal to block the ban. thi...

Important regardless of the specifics of this policy. i think it seems important. were all watching to see what happens when the judicial branch and the trump administration come into conflict. now that we have seen that happen, one of the things that have been exposed by that conflict is that the court has had to explain stuff so basic you would expect a high school freshman to have already mastered it and the court had to explain this to the administration because the administration didnt know...

Important regardless of the specifics of this policy. i think it seems important. were all watching to see what happens when the judicial branch and the trump administration come into conflict. now that we have seen that happen, one of the things that have been exposed by that conflict is that the court has had to explain stuff so basic you would expect a high school freshman to have already mastered it and the court had to explain this to the administration because the administration didnt know...

Latest updates on this topic.

You would expect a high school freshman to have already mastered it and the court had to explain this to the administration because the administration didnt know it already so let me give you a couple of these from the ruling. even if you are not a lawyer, you will see what i mean here, this isnt like a complex point of order. this is like hey, duh, you guys. footnote 8. "the government asserts that unlike the president courts do not have access to classified information about the threats posed ...

Plausible in their argument that he was a source. and to protect their confidentiality. the problem with many of the laws they cite, including the federal law, is that exceptions have been made when you have an allegation of a crime. for example, in california, the grady case in 2006, apple lost that case against bloggers that were found to be covered by the law. footnote 8 of that case, the court said it isnt looking at this as an alleged criminal act, and it might not reach the same conclusion...