situation that they face. and we certainly don t need to send the signal that we re indifferent to their situation, do we? the greatest generation came home from world war ii recognizing whether we like it or not we re part of this world and we ll have to remember that lesson. and i realize this was a foreign policy question but you will be part of the national security and foreign policy team and let me say that one of my greatest concerns with regard to our failure to veto this resolution, therefore to let it be adopted by the u.n. security council, is that people will argue that this establishes international law. and somehow this congress and this new administration are going to have to send the signal that we do not recognize that with regard to the israeli presence in certain sections of jerusalem that we do not
security situation that they face. and we certainly don t need to send the signal that we re indifferent to their situation, do we? the greatest generation came home from world war ii whether we recognize it or not, we re part of this world, sir. we re going to have to remember that lesson. and i realize this was a foreign policy question but you re going to be part of the national security on foreign policy team. let me say that one of my greatest concerns with regard to our failure to veto this resolution and therefore to let it be adapted by the u.n. security council is that people will argue that this establishes international law. and somehow this congress and this new administration are going to have to send the signal that we do not recognize that with regard to the israeli presence in certain sections of
i m thinking about security in the pacific. there are a lot of areas where where we have tensions with the south china sea and tibet and human rights. my view is that the obama administration has done a pretty reasonably good job of cooperating with china where there is room for that cooperation. and managing the tensions that exist in the relationship. i do know this. it is extraordinarily important that the united states and china have the best possible relationship that they can important to both countries. i think that s the way i would approach this. and you need to approach it as a whole and not in discreet elements of the relaonship. and final foreign policy question for you. it has to do with israel and the american embassy.
right now we ll take a quick turn over to foreign policy expectations as leezly as he made them. with that i will bring in steve clemens. i want to ask you, the biggest foreign policy question is this iran nuclear deal. he vowed to renegotiate the terms. could he derail this completely? reporter: well, i think what he can do is he can tell the iranians, we would be immediately isolating ourselves. it is in the a treaty. it is an international arrangeme arrangement. just like president obama didn t need congress to proceed with the iran deal donald trump doesn t need congress to basically pull out of it. it is an international arrangement for europe, other
didn t quite know how to answer was knowing now what you know now would you invade iraq again? and the answer should be absolutely not. but the answer should also be should we go back to iraq to another war now? absolutely not. so your opposition to a no-fly zone in syria do you think those who are proposing it who include not only republican candidates but hillary clinton. right. do you think they don t know what they re talking about? are they just trying to sound tough? what s the reason behind it? i think they re mistaken. but i think it s the most important foreign policy question of our time, of this part of the year, this part of the debate it should be asked of every candidate. are you for a no-fly zone? because if you are for a no-fly zone, i think you re naive. i think it s a recipe for confrontation with russia. i think many on our side on the republican side say i m going to be the next ronald reagan, ronald reagan would never do a no-fly zone.