Fourth Amendment Doesn T News Today

judge permitting them to enter. the search by a large uniformed team -- ununiformed team, excuse me, took hours and included getting into trumps safe. mr. trump who announced the search in a statement on his website railed against it claiming prosecutorial misconduct and political persecution. he was in manhattan at the time in preparation for an upcoming deposition, part of the civil investigation by the new york state attorneys office into his organizations finances. the former presi...

Im todd piro in for rob schmitt. President trump is willing to do just that if it means securing border. Griff jenkins live in washington, d. C. Where congress is not expected to take action any time soon, good morning, griff. The president wants a wall and wants it now and wants to do whatever it takes to get it. I would will willing to shut down government if democrats dont give us votes for border security, lets get rid of lottery and go to system immigration based on merit, we need great peo...

Technology. my guess is that originalists and scalia in particular, would disagree. so what do you do if the text of the fourth amendment doesnt answer a question? where do you go next? >> well, senator, just to clarify what i intended to say and i may well have misspoken, there is an originalist take, i think, on the question of what happens with a cell phone. as the supreme court held in the riley case, there was a way in which you assess principles of the constitution, the text of the constit...

So the original meaning of fourth amendment wont tell you what to do with the new technology. original actual sentencings in scalia in particular would disagree. what do you do if the text of the fourth amendment doesnt answer a question. where do you go next? >> just to clarify and i may have misspoken, theres an originalist take on the question of what happens with a cell phone. as the supreme court held in the riley case, there was a way in which you assess principals of the constitution and ...

Do with a new technology. my guess is that originalists, and scalia in particular, would disagree. so what do you do if the text of the fourth amendment doesnt answer a question? where do you go next? >> well, senator, just to clarify what i intended to say, and i may well have misspoken, there is an originalist take, i think, on the question of what happens with a cell phone. as the supreme court held in the riley case, there was a way in which you assess principles of the constitution, the tex...

0 first of two long and intense days of questioning from members of the senate judiciary committee began this morning with democrats using their questions to allow jackson to issue a rebuttal to republican accusations that she has been soft on crime and republicans pressing her on her record as a judge and public defender and bringing up a whole host of conservative hobby horses. things like critical race theory. jackson has tried to stay above the fray in her responses. early on in the hearing,...

Already, aclu is going to be up in arms over this and some libertarian republicans i imagine dont like this, whats the response to them? >> they are morons, fourth amendment doesnt protect people in this case, theres no reasonable expectation of privacy when youre talking an airport setting and so, you know, when they are sitting about human rights abuses they need to understand the consequences of this and so, you know, for me its really important that we continue to programs like this, we cont...

Within the islamic -- not within world vision itself and after the fact, the u.s. government discovered, well, we may have a problem here and then incredibly the islamic relief agency threatened to sue if theyre not given the money, i mean, what a situation to be in where you have bin laden-linked group threat tong sue if the u.s. government doesnt hand over taxpayer money. jillian: lets take a look at the quote of the middle east form report for the national review and it says, quote, u.s. agen...

Originalists. how could the framers possibly imagine modern contraptions? thermal images didnt exist in the 1700s. the framers had no idea what it was. so under the caricature that the democrats have suggested, you would assume the originalists in the case would all line up on the side of saying, gosh, the fourth amendment doesnt cover that. yet the kilo case, the majority opinion, 5-4 was written by justice scalia. the leading originalist on the court. it was joined by justice thomas. indeed ju...

The framers possibly imagined modern contrivances, modern contraptions. well, thermal images did not exist in the 1700s. >> right. >> the framers had no idea what it was. under the caricature that some of the democrats have suggested you would assume the originalists in the case would all line up on the side of saying well gosh the fourth amendment doesnt cover that. and yet the kilo case, the majority fin, 5-4 opinion was written by justice scalia, perhaps the leading originalist on the board. ...