Frederick Knapp News Today

14156550001. And entering access code, 146 703 5243. When we reach your item and you would like this submit your public testimony, please press star and 3 to be added to the queue. Each speaker will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. When you have 30 seconds remaining, you will hear a chime indicating your time is almost up. When the time is reached, i will announce your time is up. Best practice to speak clearly and slowly, and please mute the volume on your television or computer. Before...

Matcha n more and a Small Business as much as shake shack or the lakers are a Small Business. They are a franchise business coming from new york city, trying to further gentrify the mission with gold leaf ice cream. This is not about competition or Small Business but rather what we should allow a community to be misled by opportunistic young men. You should do the right thing and have them submit honest paperwork so the city can actually understand whats going into our small area. Operator you h...

Cream. This is not about competition or Small Business but rather what we should allow a community to be misled by opportunistic young men. You should do the right thing and have them submit honest paperwork so the city can actually understand whats going into our small area. Operator you have 16 questions remaining. Good evening. I am amy lu. I was born and raised in San Francisco and live in the portola district currently. I work for a company that supports Small Businesses. I support matcha n...

to note that there are nine lots between the addresses 1215 and 1275, as seen here. most of them have structures at the rear. eight have structures at the very front. the original structures at the rear were from the 1870s. within 10 years, the structures at the front were built one by one. my clients property is the exception property that has no front structure. the appellants take the position that all the the existing structure is not historic enough to preserve, that its location ...

supervisor campos: your argument would be that there is no substantial advantage? >> correct, we have not been presented with any substantial evidence. supervisor cohen: did the report also look at the potential impact of the new construction for surrounding properties that might be included in a new historic district? >> yes. the department invited the new project and took into consideration the offsite historic resources of any potential historic districts and considered that with th...

supervisor cohen: did the report also look at the potential impact of the new construction for surrounding properties that might be included in a new historic district? >> yes. the department invited the new project and took into consideration the offsite historic resources of any potential historic districts and considered that with the proposed project. president chiu: any follow up to your question? supervisor cohen: now that you call me, i think i will ask one more question. this b...

therefore you bear on the side of having an environmental review? i do not know what planning has to say about that. thank you. >> joy naverette of planning staff. we responded to that in our pocket. the substantial evidence rule is the standard of review for determination of whether a building is a historic resource for the purposes of ceqa. it is not their argument that requires us to prepare an eir. in the city of fresno in 2008, the court concluded the substantial evidence rule and...

presentation of up to 10 minutes. >> good afternoon. on understand you received over 275 pages of information regarding this appeal. you should have been two page appeal letter from the appellant and you should have something from the product sponsor. he should have a planning department appealed response and lastly he should have a late submission by the appellate which contains over 80 pages. because the planning department did not receive the late submission from the appellant until...