Future Interference News Today

And they would often make an argument that resonates with what were experiencing now. the verdict form will only have two lines, guilty and not guilty. i wish it had a third line and that was innocent, exonerated. but because my client is innocent, they worry. but that drives home the point that even if the senate aquits him, that is far from announcing he is innocent, far from an exoneration. and my greatest fear is if they vote not to convict him, they vote to acquit, theyre voting in favor of...

Him, lavrov, not putin, mind you, but the foreign minister, what happens in your heart and head? >> well, this is an unthinkable scene. i mean first of all, just on protocol grounds, what is the russian foreign minister doing having a bilateral meeting with the president of the united states? >> his equivalent is the secretary of state. >> correct. he would be normally, in the normal course of things, if there werent something else going on at the state department with his counterpart. but also ...

Doing having a bilateral meeting with the president of the united states? >> his equivalent is the secretary of state. >> correct. he would be normally in the normal course of things, if there werent something else going on at the state department with his counterpart. but also, again, remember the dog that isnt barking. the zelensky oval office meeting at a head of state level that isnt happening. so the message here is you interfered in our election, ill pretend it didnt happen for the duratio...

But better to start that recovery process sooner rather than later. thats for sure. >> when you see a picture like the scene today in the oval office with our president seated andr grinning and looming abov him lavrov. not putin, mind you, but the foreign minister. what happens in your heart and head? >> well, this is an unthinkable scene. just on protocol grounds, what is the russian foreign minister doing having a bilateral meeting with the president of the united states? >> his equivalent is ...

Community confirming that russia interfered on the presidents behalf with the election. so when you put that together with the firing of comey and now his language with the russians, theres very little other way to interpret this, but a green light for the russians and essentially a forgiveness as is reported in this article. three former officials actually interpret this as forgiveness of the russian interference and a green light for possible future interference. you know many of us were wonde...

Forgiveness interference and a green light for possible future interference. you know many of us were wondering and ever since, what was the russians may have on the president. how could they have compromised him. he actually compromised himself at what they have on him is very own conversations with them where he tells them i am okay with this. i am not concerned about this interference and he does it knowingly. when you combine that in databases where people who need the read out to do their j...

That was after the meeting that it was after the president been breached by the intelligence committee confirming that russia interfered on the presidents behalf in the election. when you put it together in the firing of comey and now his language with the russians, there is very little other way to interpret this, a green light for the russians and essentially a forgiveness as it is reported in the article. it was interpreted as forgiveness interference and a green light for possible future int...

Accounts or invent privileges or just outright refuse to testify. and we saw the republicans tell them that if they didnt want to continue a voluntary interview, they could just walk away. and so we werent able to pursue our lines of inquiry, which i think would have shined a lot of light on who worked with the russians and what we could do to protect against future interference by the russians >> my last question -- again, im pretty sure you cant answer this, but im going ask -- has the special...

And we saw the republicans tell them that if they didnt want to continue a voluntary interview, they could just walk away. and so we werent able to pursue our lines of inquiry, which i think would have shined a lot of light on who worked with the russians and what we can do to protect against future interference by the russians. >> my last question, again, im pretty sure you cant answer this, but im just going to ask. has the special counsels office requested the transcripts of other witnesses t...

Role than the prosecutor. the prosecutor has to look at who has violated existing laws. congress should be looking at what laws do we need to pass to protect us from future interference in our elections. and they havent done that. they have not had a serious investigation of what even happened. they are not willing to, as has been pointed out, look at who made the phone call. if theres nothing to hide, why wouldnt they look at that? they need to, instead of saying theres no collusion, which is m...