Given Podesta News Today

That they based their conclusion on the fact that the rnc was hack, okay? if the rnc was not hacked, then that casts doubt on their conclusions! i dont understand why this is that difficult to understand. if youre basing something based upon -- >> regardless of whether -- regardless of whether the rnc was hacked, and that would be a big and new development, i think we know to a certainty, given podesta and debbie wasserman schultz, that the dnc was hacked. why arent we, as americans, upset about...

Was hacked and that would be a big and new development, i think we know to a certainty, given podesta and -- that the dnc was hacked. why arent we, as americans upset about the fact that a foreign hostile actor, apparently, put its thumb on the scale in our election and why dont donald trump want to get to the bottom of that as he takes office? thats the issue. >> okay. there is a couple things, one i am outraged, i dont think any foreign entity, any individual -- >> why dont you say that and wh...

Their conclusion on the fact that the rnc was hacked the, okay? if the rnc was not hacked, then that casts doubt on their conclusions! i dont understand why this is that difficult to understand. if youre basing something based on -- >> regardless of whether the rnc was hacked, and that would be a big and new development, i think we know to a certainty, given podesta and debbie wasserman schultz, that the dnc was hacked. why arent we, as americans, upset about the fact that a foreign hostile acto...

Do at 9:24 last night in that very? >> no. michael, "the new york times" in their story said that they based their conclusion on the fact that the rnc was hacked. if the rnc was not hacked, then that casts doubt on their conclusions. i dont understand why this is that difficult to understand. if youre basing something -- >> regardless of whether the rnc was hacked and that would be a big and new development, i think we know to a certainty given podesta and debbie wasserman-schultz that the dnc w...

Death matters. wasnt that a troubling thing to do at 9:34 last night in that very -- >> michael, "the new york times" in their story said they based their conclusion on the fact that the rnc was hacked. if the rnc was not hacked, then that casts doubt on their conclusions. i dont understand why this is that difficult to understand. if you are basing something -- >> regardless of whether the rnc was hacked and that would be a big and new development, i think we know to a certainty given podesta a...

Okay? if the rnc was not hacked, then that casts doubt on their conclusions. i dont understand why this is that difficult to understand. if youre basing something on -- >> regardless of whether -- regardless of whether the rnc was hacked and that would be a big and new development, i think we know to a certainty, given podesta and debbie wasserman schultz that the dnc was hacked, why arent we, as americans, upset about the fact that a foreign hostile actor apparently put its thumb on the scale i...