hill he ll lose tonight. if he doesn t win, that s a huge story and an unexpected story, to me the story line is trump wins, he trumps because these other guys aren t in his league. it s a home game for him. television is where he lives. these other guys are putting on acts planning stuff, figuring out what they re going to say tonight. he could walk on there without any thought and beat them. these other guys are learning a dance for the occasion. he is donald trump. who is jeb bush. i don t know what is he? take a look at this numbers. these are our new numbers, we asked voters across the country, look at these numbers, 26% positive, 40% negative. he s been around forever. what does it say after six months of jeb bush s campaign. it started off with all this talk of endorsements, we re looking at a field of 17
extreme person he can in iowa to win that primary. if he doesn t win iowa he s toast and going to do whatever it takes to try to get elected. so this is just another one of those situations where again, he knows better but will do whatever it takes to become president. well, what about him as a candidate? does this prove that maybe he s not very well thought out, that he may be a good precenter but policy-wise he really doesn t know? you know over and over he s had these foot in mouth problems, you know he said that the single greatest active foreign policy by regan was firing air traffic controllers and he stood up to 100,000 union protesters. he was asked about evolution and said i ll punt on that one. that s your inside voice, not outside voice. this is a guy that really did all right here in wisconsin. he had a recall that made him stronger because fundamentally people in wisconsin didn t think that was nice and we re fund
he s this independent guy who tells it like it is. so new hampshire, he has to give it all he s got there. if he doesn t win new hampshire, i think like new hampshire is the reason he can be considered a presidential candidate. i was also going to say, i found the comparison between tom brady and christie and is bridgegate, i found it funny that he defended tom brady. they re both in a similar position. yeah. we have that clip. let s listen to what he said about the tom brady thing. doesn t seem all that conclusive to me. people in public life wind up becoming targets for various reasons. so here is tom brady. great looking guy. wealthy beyond imagination. married to gisels bundchen and four super bowls. it seems like tom brady s life is almost too perfect. and we have the republican ticket, chris christie and tom brady.
party, i think, from his constituent services like casey said, he plays well in those forums. he s this independent guy who tells it like it is. so new hampshire, he has to give it all he s got there. if he doesn t win new hampshire, i think like new hampshire is the reason he can be considered a presidential candidate. i was also going to say, i found the comparison between tom brady and christie and is bridgegate, i found it funny that he defended tom brady. they re both in a similar position. yeah. we have that clip. let s listen to what he said about the tom brady thing. doesn t seem all that conclusive to me. people in public life wind up becoming targets for various reasons. so here is tom brady. great looking guy. wealthy beyond imagination. married toga sell bundchen and four super bowls.
a lot of ed against this guy evidence against this guy. i think this guy s guilty, but they re giving this guy the best defense money can buy. jon: yeah. well he s presumed innocent until proven. john, what do you think? exigent circumstance for the fbi to go search his room or not? i don t think so. i think at the time he was detained, there was no fear that he was going to commit any kind of destruction of evidence, there was no information for the fbi to believe other people were in the room to destroy the evidence. they could have easily gotten a warrant. in today s technological time we can easily get a warrant through computers. it s not that difficult. so right now the prosecution has the burden of showing whether or not the warrantless search was reasonable or not. it s a preponderance of the evidence, so there s a 51-49 shot he could win. if he doesn t win, then he basically winds up defending the charges as they are which is a slam dunk prosecution case. so this is the on