Page 7 - Human Involvement News Today

New book. this appears to be operator error from the air traffic controller who was in training. he had someone with him. how does that work if a trainee makes a mistake? >> its still on the onus of the trainer to correct it and its still his responsibility ultimately. the trainee is not going to suffer discipline consequences. in that sense, if youre looking at that, that is what is going to happen. in this situation, there is always going to be human involvement and when the human involvement ...

The water because that debris field if that is what it is floated and moved a great distance in the last two weeks. we have a lot of work ahead of us. >> philip woods mother gave a rather emotional interview. he is, of course, one of the victims of the flight disaster. she spoke with kxas in dallas. the last time she saw him she describes it and the horrible thoughts. we can imagine as parents what his last moments were like on that plane. >> dont ever forget to hold close the people you love. i...

Seven hours were like where everybody was dead or whether there was life activity or human involvement in the decision to change the course so radekicalr >> lets assume the passengers were not aware that anything was wrong. and as many of them fall asleep on the way to beijing. they are about to land at 6:15 in the morning and they are not landing. they look out the window and are still over an ocean. you wonder if they were getting concerned about the plane going on and on over the ocean. we kn...

Has to lead one to the interrance that it was a human involvement. there has to be a hijacking or a stolen aircraft. >> if someone shhas the airplan thats a stretch. sometime in the next 12 moptnth they might do something with those options. it doesnt look good. we can make excuses but there are too many points here that dont add up. >> they suggests he believes the plane could have made it to pakistan and thats where we need to be looking and thats what we need to be worried about. >> tom is a ...

Into the transponder, which is the emergency code, they did not put in the hijacking code, they turned it off. so we have to infer there was human involvement in this and it has to be a hijacking or stolen aircraft. >> mike? >> i have to agree entirely. and for safetys sake, we have to assume that going forward if someone has this airplane, thats a real stretch, and want to do something with it, sometime in the next 12 months they might do something with it, we need to look into those options. b...

>> something intention happened prior to it crashing. when we talk about the a-cart being turned off and then right in the small session of when there is no communication available the aircraft makes turn and we are told that is based on input into the a pilot system. that tells us it was human involvement. we see a primary blip on the radar and that tells us the transponder was turned off and stayed off. it wasnt failure. it stayed off at that altitude. i am less concerned about the

Altitude changes because we are dealing a non-transponder case so judging the altitude isnt science. the difference could be something that would be much more dichfficult to determine a it could be an error. >> you are left with all of these hours, right? if you go back to the one theory it might have been a suicide issue, you are left with all of the hours the plane flew. that leaves you with the unconscio unconscious theory or the pane stuart theory. >> that part well not know for a while unti...

The hijack code. they put nothing in there accept it was turned off so it has to lead one to the inference that it was a human involvement in this and it has to be a hijacking or a stolen aircraft. >> mike? >> no, i have to agree entirely. and for safetys sake we have to assume that going forward if someone has this airplane and thats a real stretch, and wants to do something with it, sometime in the next 12 months, they might do something with it. we need to look into those options. but i have ...

The hijack code. they put nothing in there accept it was turned off so it has to lead one to the inference that it was a human involvement in this and it has to be a hijacking or a stolen aircraft. >> mike? >> no, i have to agree entirely. and for safetys sake we have to assume that going forward if someone has this airplane and thats a real stretch, and wants to do something with it, sometime in the next 12 months, they might do something with it. we need to look into those options. but i have ...

They put nothing in there except it was turned off. so again it has to lead one to the inference that it was a human involvement in this and it has to be a hijacking or a stolen aircraft. >> mike? >> no, i have to agree entirely. and for safetys sake we have to assume that going forward if someone has this airplane, and that is a real stretch and wants to do something with it, sometime in the next 12 months they may do something with it, we need to look into those options. but i have to agree wi...