while we were at holman the couple was also dealing with the anxiety of an upcoming parole hearing. if things go well, they could be reunited on the outside, but they ve been down this road before. in 95 i came up the first time. that was eight years. they put me off a year at a time. they changed the law and put me off 5 years to 2002 and then again 5 years to 2007. so how are you feeling about your next chance? after what i know about this state of alabama, i don t know. i got to the point where i don t trust people, i don t trust the law, i don t trust anybody. i will probably never live to get out of here. i don t know. i m just going to go in there and hand him the paper and answer his questions. it s kind of like playing florida lottery.
ever again collects the last time i checked, china has the biggest threat to the united states. russia s economy is a size of france? tucker: texas. now russia and china are doing military exercises, and we are on the sidelines going, we need to act mean on everything with russia because of the mueller investigation. it had a profound policy effect on our government and that will never know the effect of the american people, our geo-political position, that mustn be examined. tucker: also the social fabric. i notice it here, like you, not from washington but i spend most of my life here, i ve known your for much of that time. the city has become paranoid, distrustful, angry. i talk to people all the time, i can t text that you, i don t trust what you mean you don t trust your text? i can have this conversation, i m too nervous. people are afraid. do you want to live in a place where people are afraid? where the prosecution state becomes so big and powerful, a
first, chairman cummings was very clear that if michael cohen lied under oath that he would pursue it and he would hold michael cohen accountable. so i think if it is proven that he has lied, chairman cummings should take the necessary steps. and if that includes referring him to the doj, that s exactly what he s going to do. but at the same time, listen, i don t trust anybody that s really associated with this white house. they have consistently lied over and over and over again. you know, secretary nielsen about family separation, wilbur ross about, you know, sa citizenship question on the k n census. now you have michael cohen. did he lie? i m not sure. but he did have corroborating evidence that backed up some of his claims. now it s up to the oversight committee and the ways and means committee to follow through on these lines of questioning. i care about the taxes. are we going to get our hands on these tax returns? are we going to be able to compare them to the financial
writing, when the president attacked the independence of the justice department by intervening in a case in which he is implicated, you did not speak out. when he attacked the press as an enemy of the people, you again were silent. and now he comes for congress, seeking to strip it of its greatest power that of the purse. you have chosen to keep your misgivings and your rising alarm private. that must end. you must speak out. katie, i love this. rising alarm! katie: i don t trust adam schiff at all. i m sure there are some republicans every scene on the record that are saying, we don t like this national emergency. mike lee, a constitutionalist, said it s unconstitutional but it s legal. the way they proceeded to the legislative branch for years and years. their other republican saying publicly that they don t like the way the branch has been abused. but for adam schiff think that that republicans on capitol hill are going to be allies with him after everything he has done an
do you know that they have been? well, if donald trump took them as the washington post story states, then they re effectively in the hands of the subject. and, you know, i don t trust donald trump to turn them over. we know in the past he s known to rip up important pieces of paper and destroy them. notes that are important for presidential records. there s been reporting on that. so i see it as we have no way to obtain the physical evidence now other than getting it from donald trump, someone who has wholly uncooperative. would it be possible to bring the interpreter in for questioning whether or not they have notes? yes. again, the notes just memorialize what occurred. you can rely on a witness account. you can imagine it was probably pretty memorable for this interpreter. something she did not forget watching the president and vladimir putin, you know, talk to each other. so she would be a reliable witness. the times report the fbi was so concerned the president could