Impeachment Narrative News Today

Wt is the full extent cleared away. Chuck rosenberg. Of the democrats prior senator mccains former coordination with the whistleblower, and who else did colleague, jeff flake, retired the whistleblower coordinate senator from arizona, surmised this effort with . That if a secret impeachment second, what is the full extent vote were held, 3035 of the of ukraines Election Meddling Senate republican members would against the Trump Campaign . Vote to impeach. And i thought how sad, how sad, and thir...

From the Mueller Report would be unsupportable in the house and unsustainable in the senate. Do you remember writing that . Yes, i do. Why did you write that . Because i think its true. The fact is this was reviewed by main justice. The special counsel did not reach a conclusion and he should have. I think his justification quite frankly was a bit absurd not reaching a conclusion. The Deputy Attorney general did, and they came to the right conclusion. I dont think this is a real case for obstruc...

They were not going to issue that statement that Rudy Giuliani wanted to include burisma and the 2016 elections there was no white house meeting. It soon became clear to them that the Security Assistance was also at risk and that took on a renewed importance for them. Well, following the 25th call, the July 25th Call, ambassador sondland and volker worked closely with mr. Giuliani and the ukrainians to help draft a statement that the president could make, president zelensky. Wasnt that right . Y...

And i thought the threat to our nation was well articulated earlier today by Professor Feldman when you said, if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a democracy, we live in a monarchy or we live under a districtatorship. My view is if people cannot depend on the fairness of our elections, then what people are calling divisive today will be absolutely nothing compared to the shredding of our democracy. After the events of ukraine unfold...

That we find ourselves in. And i thought the threat to our nation was wellarticulated earlier today by professor feldman. When you said if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a democracy. We live in a monarchy or we live under a dictatorship. My view is that if people cannot depend on the fairness of our elections, then what people are calling divisive today will be absolutely nothing compared to the shredding of our democracy. After t...

President zelensky decided that they were not going to issue thatt statement that Rudy Giuliani wanted to include burisma in the 2016 elections, there was no white house meeting. It soon became clear to them that the Security Assistance was also at risk. And that took on a renewed importance for them. Well, following the 25th call, the t july 25th call, ambassador sondland and volker worked closely with mr. Giuliani and the ukrainians to help draft a statement that the president could make, pres...

I thought the threat to our nation was wellarticulated earlier today by Professor Feldman when you said, if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a democracy, we live in a monarchy or we live under a dictatorship. My view is that a people cannot depend on the fairness of will be absolutely nothing compared to the shredding of our democracy. After the events of ukraine unfolded, the president claimed the reason he requested an investigati...

We have always known. they are not concerned about facts. completely obsessed with getting rid of trump. that all of those investigations from russia hoax to ukraine, all of those things have been about trying to find a crime and fit it somehow into this impeachment narrative. and they have never been able to come up with anything. its sad. it shows that they are a party run by hate and they have run out of ideas. thats what i see when i hear that kind of stuff. they are willing to sacrifice win...

United states, donald j. trump, knew everything. and i yield back. >> gentleman yields back. mr. biggs. >> mr. castor, what is direct evidence? >> when a witness personally observed a fact and testifies to it. >> and what is hearsay evidence. >> well out of court statement offer for the truth of the matter asserted is something you learn in law school. >> and hearsay is inadmissible unless it falls under define exception, is that right. >> yes. and there are 23 with the residual exception. >> an...

One thing is clear. as it related to this scheme, the president of the united states donald j. trump knew everything and i yield back. >> mr. castor, whats direct evidence? >> when i witness personally observes a fact and testifies to it. >> and whats hearsay evidence? >> out of court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted is something that you learn in lawth school. >> hearsay is inadmissible unless it falls under exceptions. andio i believe when every witns testified including ...