Page 361 - Implication News Today

Heavily on u.s. security aid and on a positive relationship with the united states. >> do you see a quid pro quo? >> well, i think first its important to note that you dont need to have a quid pro quo, however, i do think that within the transcripts that we have seen so far that there is an implication of u.s. support, all that the u.s. does for ukraine and i think there is an inherent power imbalance in this. thats an important thing to note. especially from a diplomatic perspective. from a dip...

The call summary between president trump and the president of ukraine. what was your reaction? you have read it, i assume? >> i have. my reaction was the same as i had a few days ago, which is this remains deeply troubling and well see where it leads. but the first reaction is troubling. >> was it -- get some support for that. in the summary that we saw, did that amount to a quid pro quo agreement or at least the implication of a quid pro quo in your view? >> i dont know that i focused so much o...

Steps that would be i think foolish for anyone and the scientist and see the kind of claim that where to actually properly cope with it and particularly to protect the most vulnerable people in society the report says that we need really investment to the tunes of i think up to several hundreds of billions of dollars adequately protect our costs. but what it does say that by doing so we can really protect people from floods and reduce the risk of flood by the magnitude and to hundreds of times s...

The magnitudes of 10 to hundreds of times safe as it were and that has really clear implication for people that means that were protecting governments would be protecting their livelihoods their health their ability to get clean water their ability to feed themselves and i think its worth stressing in the report does this that this doesnt just affect the people living on pace and the people living on islands the effects of any sort of sea level rise in extreme weather that will ripple inland as ...

Protect my vulnerable people in society the report says that we need really investment to the tune of i think several hundreds of billions of dollars and of quickly protect our coasts. but what it does say that by doing so we can really protect people from floods and reduce the risk of flood by 23 of the magnitudes that tend to hundreds of times safe as it were and that has really clear implication for people that means that were protecting governments would be protecting the livelihoods their h...

But hes also mindful that, you know, its his job to protect whistle-blowers and intelligence officer has come forward here and is expecting the protection that the whistle-blower law affords. maguire, former navy s.e.a.l. and served his country honorably for decades is caught in the middle in here. he doesnt have a dog in this. he doesnt even have an opinion im told whether it should be turned over to congress and once doj told him he couldnt do it, he thought the least he could do is appear bef...

Wanted to see. i think the democrats are in a tough spot. nancy pelosi is in a tough spot. the impeachment math is still not great for them. they still need to gain most of the majority of their caucus. they only have about 20 democrats to spare if they want to pass an impeachment vote, which i think is very important to them. at the same time, the base is increasingly frustrated by this, and she certainly doesnt want -- at the same time that she doesnt want to have moderate democrats at risk ne...

Mad at nancy pelosi and the democrats for not acting in trump. >> you got to read philip bump. hes always thinking about things in a way that you would like to but cant. thats interesting. i keep jumping to well never remove him. youll never remove him. but this is a much more urgent concern. if they go through the process of -- well, they are, right, if they get to try to pass articles of impeachment or whatever the operative verb is and they dont in the house, what would be the implication of ...

Didnt have to read her address, she actually memorized it. the implication is of course but to ensure the future, everyone must sign on to this global solution. seize control of our economy our way of life come our way of transport, how many children you want to have, and if we dont go along, we will be punished by our own children. hi young people are starting to understand your betrayal. the eyes of all future generations are upon you, and if you choose to fail us, i say we will never forgive ...

The latest wave of climate fanaticism is just socialism in a new mask. they used to go on about the population bomb in the 1970s when the planet couldnt sustain any more people. its now its weather fluctuation. but the solution is always going to be the same. its not innovation and free markets, its limit the population. limit families. take away their freedoms. but the tragedy is, this time the left has moral cover. today, pope francis drop this video address to the united nations climate summi...