Page 392 - Implication News Today

Francis with a mugshot from president 1990s saying, "drink responsibly." safe to say republicans see him as trumps biggest threat? >> i dont know if his biggest threat. i think biden is his biggest threat. a beto/biden ticket or biden/beto, some form of that, could be formidable. but, you know, beto orourke is still relatively unproven on the national scene. running for senate in texas against ted cruz is very different than running for president. weve seen that with the opposition research dump...

>> a little happy end zone dance? >> yeah. exactly. exactly. >> we got him. >> got you -- gotcha moment. >> reporter: when petersons brother bill saw the experiment videos, he couldnt believe it. >> its all reverse-engineered stuff. its all designed to get a result. to me, its not scientific at all. >> reporter: for michaels defense, the implication was clear. the jury had been duped. after all, in its closing argument, the state had even played on deavers credibility to try to secure a convicti...

Right. >> they believe in the end -- >> right. when he mentions jews it is always in the context of israel. talk about a dual loyalty implication. whatever other views they have are unimportant. >> i think he can sit back and doesnt have to say anything. what the implication is -- of course im not anti-jew. my son-in-law is jewish. my daughter has converted to judaism. you dont have a problem in the white house. coming up, medi hassan is here with his take on right wing extremism helping to cr...

To this threat as much as to the jihadist threat. >> peter newman, we appreciate your insight and perspective. thank you again. >> thank you very much. i believe we now do have our senior international correspondent ivan watson. ivan there live in christs church, just outside the hospital there and leading our coverage, ivan? >> reporter: thank you, george. much of the focus of the investigation right now is on one key suspect who appeared in a christs church court earlier on saturday, charged...

To this, if someone says to you you can, quote, sleep well tonight because you have friends in high places. i spoke with rudy, very positive. you are loved. there was never a doubt that they are in our corner. that seems pretty, like -- listen, we got your back, no? >> in some fashion. maybe not a pardon, though. we dont know. >> it reminds me of the kind of thing you hear on a movie where prisoners are talking over a prison tell phone and theyre concerned its being recorded. so its all kind of ...

Illinois, and california. so the idea that these arent legitimate, you know, we should put that to rest. now the question is the timing is they cannot make this look political because the president, look, a largely democratic city, its a democratically elected district attorney. and so certainly, the allegations of partisanship are there. weve seen that the president can attack the credibility of an institution. as you saw with the special counsel. i think he can do that here if, you know, so as...

Is they cannot make this look political because the president, look, a largely democratic city, its a democratically elected district attorney. and so certainly, the allegations of partisanship are there. weve seen that the president can attack the credibility of an institution. as you saw with the special counsel. i think he can do that here if, you know, so as with all prosecutors, look, i face this, all prosecutors do. you need to be taken seriously and youre bringing charges without fear or ...

So its all kind of oblique. you know, remember that friend of ours were going to take care of him and youre okay, we love you. i think thats a very conditional -- >> that was cold. >> this is the kind of i love you like i love you now. and i love you because youre my guy and im going to take care of you and youre going to take care of me. thats the implication. jennifer is right that you cant read a direct line here. but why is it that these people need to communicate obliquely? >> and the timin...

Too. >> inappropriateness is the new normal. im not being sarcastic. we are talk about the president doing something inappropriate. whether a news flash before us that this president would do anything that was inappropriate. lets go back to facts or not facts and alternative facts. im not sure what world we are living in. he has an interest. keerly in calling what was the implication of the call? why would he call? it is obstruction of justice. those are the two competing parts. >> and you to as...

>> even talking about the joint defense agreement was just a horrible person. >> how could he be in a joint defense agreement for someone that lies all of the time. >> yeah. legally. >> i dont know if legally -- im not sure. >> im not sure if it legally reaches that but of course it was the implication. keep quiet and youll be taken care of. he said he never asked for a pardon. they try today clarify after it was revealed there were