Page 403 - Implication News Today

Them. didnt you know they would be monitoring your communications, and theyd get you the way that they did? >> heres the irony of that. the text messages that were an old cell phone are exculpatory. they prove he was my source and he denies, and that his source is a wikileaks lawyer. i did honestly forget a series of text messages that prove that i was telling the truth. >> but even the ones you were having during the testimony, the same day? theyre saying have you ever spoken to him about it? y...

Same day? that really jumps the shark. theyre saying have you ever spoken to him about it? you were talking that day. you say, no -- i dont want to dig into the facts with you because i respect you and your council. >> first of all, i dont know if thats true, but he is an impressionist. thats what he does and he does a very funny imitation. certainly not an implication that he should kill himself or that he should lie. >> but you did tell him he shouldnt testify, he should plead the fifth. dont ...

In this indictment? the answer, fof course, is no. in paragraph 12 it says after the july 22 release of stolen e-mails from organization 1 -- wikileaks -- a senior trump campaign official was directed to contact stone. so who is it that can direct senior campaign officials to do that? there is an implication there without a name. because another senior campaign official, i suppose, could have done it, but thats not the implication of this to me. >> we know at least one of the people that roger s...

>> the passage that says a senior official pressured roger to do something. that was it. the direction of someone above that senior official that they did it. so, who is that person that is referred to in paragraph 12? that has to have been possibly the president. possibly jared kushner. possibly don jr. they could have been high enough to be above a circle. >> as a prosecutor, not everything is charged as a crime. do you view this as an indictment about activities full stop or obstruction with ...

My clients would never be considered for interim access in that situation. certainly a lot more detail we need to find out whether or not this was kline coming in trying to fix a logjam or if there were truly some serious improprieties here beyond the jared kushner situation. >> im worried the darker implication of what youre suggesting there is already spelled out in kens reporting. he is saying this is at least 30 cases in which kline overruled security clearance experts for incoming officials...

Were also entering the thirty third day of the shutdown in washington and economists try to figure out what that actually might have an implication for global for global grozier in the united states still a lot of uncertainty is a shaky market but those three companies that made the difference here on wednesday . in scored a for us there in new york with the wall street view thinking the ends. and lets get back to our coverage of davos our correspondent javier alligators spoke earlier with miche...

Happen was the trade dispute between china and the u.s. so that put some pressure on the market at some point here on wednesday and then were also entering the thirty third day of the shutdown in washington and economists try to figure out what that actually might have an implication for global or for global grows here in the united states still a lot of uncertainties a shaky market but those three companies that made the difference here on wednesday in scored a for us there in new york with the...

Genuine view and thats why i asked if you were with mr. cohen today. you are describing what you are seeing. i dont quibble with that. you mentioned "godfather 2." thats a situation where you have also congressional hearings and you have a star witness family member brought into the hearings. but as you know, mr. davis the clear implication in "godfather 2" was the threat of violence or murder. here the threat appears to be, as i understand your allegation of the crime that donald trump would us...

Capitol hill. a test from the speaker. >> the house and senate will have to pass a joint resolution to allow the president to speak on january 29th as the president is demanding. so him just saying that he will come does not necessarily mean that the actual state of the union will take place. in fact, john, i am told that in a closed-door meeting this morning nancy pelosi told her members and advised them not to bring their family members to washington next week. that was viewed by people in the...

When they wont even be paid. i think a proposal is a simple one. lets find other mutually agreeable dates when government is open. >> its my understanding that speaker pelosi told members of the caugcus this morning not to invite your families to the state of the union next tuesday. what was the implication there? >> i think the implication is we simply dont know when this president is going to acknowledge the pain that this shutdown is causing and do the right thing. >> do you think that meant ...