Page 440 - Implication News Today

Exhibit after exhibit of what the trump era embodies. its the rule of law, its the cohen, the manafort, the mccain funeral, which was a very large bit of implication, and then you have barack obama who is arguably the most popular former president in democratic history. we should point out, as the president takes the stage, he is not the most popular democratic politician, that is michelle obama, who has her book coming out in november, and youll have phil rucker, as were about to go to the fo...

Trump won. the implication here is youve got this group of unelected bureaucrats who are usurping the authority of the president to advance their own agenda. how dangerous is that to america? more or less dangerous than allowing president trump to make policy? >> i dont -- thats not my takeaway from reading that. in fact, i find this is a defensive and offensive effort at the same time. it starts with the answer to the question who wrote this. no one and everyone. because even though those folks...

His point. in the white house, he peppered him with questions the russia investigation. provoking stumbles, contradictions and lies until president eventually lost his cool. now, fast forward six weeks or so, and according to bob woodward, at least according to the "washington posts" account of the book, on march 5th, john dowd and jay sekulow met with the special counsel himself and the deputy james quarles. there upon dowd and sekulow reenacted trumps january practice session. dowd then explai...

And then the president that saturday i believe did a live radio address to explain to the country what that program was about. there was a huge controversy and so etch was then working on getting the speech together. you asked me filearned about it before then. i said no, thats accurate. >> okay. when you were in the white house, did you ever work with john hugh on the constitutional implication of any warrantless under surveillance program? >> well, i cant rule that -- right in the wake of sept...

Brittany. >> as a freshman in high school i remember that he was super famous. >> were getting a lot of coverage and that was drawing crowds to the town halls and they were getting bigger and spilling into the streets and you could sense something was happening. >> the last event we did was in bedford, new hampshire and i went upstairs to give him the exit polls and he was in the bedroom rehearsing his speech. i said we got the exit polls and he said what are they? i said youre gonna win. he sai...

>> well, theres a lot of argument by implication here, and i think its an attempt to do full justice to senator mccain. mccain himself is first in our hearts right now, not least because he was a relentlessly candid man. when he was alive and when he was less than candid, he tended to apologize for it. and so the people who are speaking today in this sacred space at this sacred hour, i think are within the bounds of propriety and grace and dignity, attempting to be candid about what mccain means...

I want to repeat some of the words in there. transfer all of that info regarding our friend david. transfer all the stuff, its all the stuff because you never know with that company, never know where hes going to be, maybe he gets hit by a truck. and the whole implication here, hits by truck, maybe theres a whole lot of stuff we need to get out of his hands. tell me what you think of that? >> if there are additional contemplation of payments that could be additional, you know, violations of the ...

Gets hit by a truck. and the whole implication here, hits by truck, maybe theres a whole lot of stuff we need to get out of his hands. tell me what you think of that? >> if there are additional contemplation of payments that could be additional, you know, violations of the law. but i think the fact that theyre talking about other things beyond perhaps marital infidelity i think lends credence to the theory this really was about influencing the election. theyre talking about kind of it goes back ...

To do and it is so dangerous. he obviously could exert control in many way, one through personnel. if he really does fire jeff sessions hes doing it for one reason. to have somebody else put in he thinks will be more beholden and listen to what trump wants, which is to impede or shutdown or derail this investigation. he can do it by i suppose firing rod rosenstein and, you know, again having a deputy a.g. who would be, you know, less open to the things that perhaps mueller is asking permission t...

Reason. to have somebody else put in he thinks will be more beholden and listen to what trump wants, which is to impede or shutdown or derail this investigation. he can do it by i suppose firing rod rosenstein and, you know, again having a deputy a.g. who would be, you know, less open to the things that perhaps mueller is asking permission to do in his investigation. because we do know theyre consulting. so there are serious things he could do, but he is doing enough damage just by what he is sa...