Improst System News Today

Controlling medical research and they are not delivering innovation that they promised. american people initially agreed this, as far as they were able to agree, you know, that we would have petter medications, but if you look at innovation, there are fewer drugs every year. we had 150 drugs every year a decade ago. now its 20. 15 drugs per year. the pipeline is drying up. their innovation is not work, and the pharmaceutical companies themselves, one of the points i make in the books is this sys...

Over one caucus night in iowa. this is, as ive said, many times before a multi-decade prospect. >> yeah. >> list en, part of that prospet of change to maybe get more diverse candidates and get a more complex and interesting debate begins with at least being -- becoming aware of how the current system actually works how the funding system works and then talking about how you want to change it. we call it the get money out movement here and it it has three new allies today inspired by that resolut...

Researchers were not motivated by money. they wanted nobel prizes and wanted to be seen as ben factors. i like that system. i think it fills our needs much better. >> you want to fulfill the ego through the manifestation of the greatness of the science and not the ego through the accumulation of a bunch of money. >> those motivations dovetail well with what i think we need, what the world needs and there are other models and answers as well that i think are very promising. some of them are alrea...

System. one of them is quite dramatic. >> youve got to the right place. >> we should repeal a law in 1980 that fostered the cozy relationship between pharmaceutical companies and universities. put the companies in the drivers seat. that law should be resgleeld if we repeal that law would w.h.o. would be in charge of medical debate? >> thats something we would decide. the system we had before 1980 worked quite well, a system under which which developed penicillin, polio vaccine t.worked really we...

Controlling medical research and they are not delivering innovation that they promised. american people initially agreed this, as far as they were able to agree, you know, that we would have petter medications, but if you look at innovation, there are fewer drugs every year. we had 150 drugs every year a decade ago. now its 20. 15 drugs per year. the pipeline is drying up. their innovation is not work, and the pharmaceutical companies themselves, one of the points i make in the books is this sys...

Wanted to be seen as ben factors. i like that system. i think it fills our needs much better. >> you want to fulfill the ego through the manifestation of the greatness of the science and not the ego through the accumulation of a bunch of money. >> those motivations dovetail well with what i think we need, what the world needs and there are other models and answers as well that i think are very promising. some of them are already bearing fruit. collaborations between drug companies, and non-profi...

>> youve got to the right place. >> we should repeal a law in 1980 that fostered the cozy relationship between pharmaceutical companies and universities. put the companies in the drivers seat. that law should be resgleeld if we repeal that law would w.h.o. would be in charge of medical debate? >> thats something we would decide. the system we had before 1980 worked quite well, a system under which which developed penicillin, polio vaccine t.worked really well. these -- these modalities that were...