Page 18 - Interagency Process News Today

To be careful. you have to take him at his word, rhetoric and actions. north korea, i dont think the presidents national security team is getting enough credit for running what is -- from all appearances is a regular disciplined normal interagency process. theyve made some pretty good decision coming into office how to deal with this quickly looming crisis but its torn us under sometimes by his bela kose rhetoric. >> you credit general mcmaster the national security adviser to the president, dif...

Right? if he said things that he deliberately didnt know -- by the way, you could read about the presidency. but to be fair a lot of presidents become students of the presidency when theyre president. but my point is if he has flipped into more reasoned and reasonable positions, i think thats probably the best of the alternatives, even if youre still right, which he was being deliberate in what he didnt know. the other point i would throw out there, it is very interesting. i have been up close t...

Reports hes received or other information? >> im not going to get into what the president knows. but there is a reason that we are undergoing an interagency process right now to look at the deal. jessica. >> i had a second question. >> im sure. >> general flynn. anyone who was at his level would undergo an investigation by the fbi with a fm reporinal . was the president ever given a final security report by the fbi on michael flynn? >> he was head of the department of the defense intelligence ag...

Facts are not completely out yet. id rather not jump to judgment on whats happening. >. >> mara. >> thank you. i want to get more clarity on iran. is the president determined to pull out of this agreement as he promised during the campaign or will that decision be determined by this review? >> i think part of the review, the interagency process is to determine where iran is in compliance with the deal and to make recommendations to the president on the path forward. >> so he might or might not d...

Organizations. theres a frightening part of the democrats that have anti-war, anti-defense. the use of defense to defend our country, this is a terrible danger for the democrats, this isnt a point that we discussed earlier. sanders and the warren wing push the democrats so far to the left that they can win primaries but never win generals again? thats the big test. the democrats will have to get through that as they fight through the trump years with their animosity toward trump, to rise through...

On what is happening. >> thank you. >> just get a little more clarity on iran. is the president determined to pull out of this agreement as he promised or will that decision be determined by this review? >> part of the review, the interagency process, is to determine where iran is in complaints with the deal and to make recommendations to the president on the path forward. >> see he might or might not pull out? this decision has yet to be made? >> thats why hes doing a review. >> that was a camp...

Denis mcdonough. but they would not take the reasoned advice of their secretary of state or secretary of defense. >> did not want to go to war. >> or national security council. >> this was the president who wanted to get us out of wars. >> even there its dangerous. weve been interagency process, pushing it through without taking advice. this is what happened to barack obamas foreign policy foray years. again, im not condemning the whole eight years. im telling everybody what we know around the t...

>> it was a relatively quick decision making process. so earlier in the week on april 5 president trump asked secretary mattis for specific plans for options to strike back at the syrian regime specifically against because of the chemical attack that they installed upon their people on april 4. by that day there were plans at the white house and then it goes back and forth. the military and the administration likes to call it an interagency process. basically what it is members of the military t...

Ezra cohen-watnick or michael ellis did anything pertinent when youre talking about intelligencet may be they sought to give information to devin nunes, chairman of the house intelligence committee, that would bolster the presidents case. it also appears that the intelligence that they showed him the names of american officials who were working for donald trump were not redacted from that information. and thats also inappropriate and concerning i think should be a subject of concern for all amer...

To be very liberal. i dont know if they are going to embarrass themselves this time. last time they were correct to at least slow it down. i dont know if they are going to embarrass themselves constitutionally and try to step in the place of the president of the united states and the administration on issues where the president is to be deferred to in great measure. and he can be now because this went through the interagency process. they fthey do that they will be reversed at the supreme court....