After news broke that a federal judge in d. C. Denied it team trumps hope for three more days, to respond to the dojs request for protective order. The deadline remains monday, five pm, despite the push from trumps lawyers. The government is seeking a protective order to keep trump from publicly disclosing evidence gathered during the dust disappointments sprawling investigation. And to keep him from threatening potential witnesses. Special counsels office wants this all to have been quickly. In a new filing they say, quote, the government stands ready to press send on a discovery production. The defendant is standing in the way. And the request for protective order, the Special Counsels office cited this social media post from trump, reading, quote, if you go after me, im coming after you. The prosecutors argued to trumps rhetoric and possible use of grand jury transcripts could have a Chilling Effect on witnesses. This afternoon on msnbc, u. S. Delegate, stacey plaskett, who served a
I know exactly. It tells you exactly the world we are living in. Great show as always my friend, great to see you. Good evening and welcome to ayman, everyone tonight. Weve got Breaking News in the Election Interference Case. The Special Counsel has requested a Protective Order against donald trump. Plus were going to debunk Donald Trumps defense. Were going to break down the antiarguments his legal team and his republican allies are already making. Then, the women at the center of the criminal trial, what to know about judge tanya chutkan, and her surprising history with the ex president. Im Ayman Mohyeldin, lets get started. I read a lot of Breaking News this evening, just moments ago, a string of developments regarding Donald Trumps third and arguably most important indictment. Judge tanya chutkan, whos overseeing this case, just denied at trumps legal team an extension to respond to a Protective Order request from the Special Counsels office. Now, prosecutors filed the request for
Im talking about, maybe, the idea that that bear was a person and that set the Internet Ablaze with everyone speculating. Because it looked way to real. What does it tell you, though, that neither the beer nor the dog is the craziest thing we have reported on it tells you, exactly, the world we are great show as always, my friend. Great to see you. Welcome to ayman, everyone. Weve got Breaking News in the Election Interference Case these Special Counsel has protected requested trumps debunked defense the empty arguments his legal team and his republican allies are already making. Then, the women at the center of the criminal trial what to know be about what judged Tanya Chutkan and her surprising history with the ex president. I am Ayman Mohyeldin. Lets get started. A riddle out of Breaking News this evening. Just moments ago a string of developments regarding Donald Trumps third and arguably judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing this case just denied trumps legal team and extension t
Im not talking about the guy. Im not talking about the guy pretending to be a dog. Im talking about maybe the idea that that bear was a person, and that sent the Internet Ablaze with everyone speculating, because it looked way too real. What is it that you think neither the bear or the dog is the craziest thing that weve reported on this week . I know exactly. It tells you exactly the world we are living in. Great show as always my friend, great to see you. Good evening. Everyone we have special news. A Special Counselor alike to that Protective Order against donald. Trump, plus debunking trumps defense. Well break down the empty units his legal team and his republican allies which theyre already making. The woman at the center of the criminal trial, what to know about judge tanya trot again, and her surprising history with the ex president. Im Ayman Mohyeldin, lets get started. I read a lot of Breaking News this evening, just moments ago, a string of developments regarding Donald Trum
[cheers and applause] greg: happy wednesday, everybody. so don t look now but the metoo movement is back but this time what s being attacked isn t women but academic integrity and once again we look to harvard. the devri in the east. you don t know who that is. trust me it worked in the meeting. he s just been accused of roughly 40 instances of plagiarism in her ph.d. dissertation and in a single academic paper she published in her career. there will be more accusations of plagiarism but she was too lazy to write more than one fake paper. which digs the question, when was the last person to have an original idea at harvard? john adams, al gore, barack obama. he must be sweating, he just ate a real spicy dog. charleston s husband is also a professor, and according to reports her one publication even ripped off the research that he did back in 2012. wait. a woman bringing up something her husband did years ago? that s not plagiarism. that s marriage. a sexist would say