Internet Piece News Today

The beat and its a dangerous -- >> what you are getting at -- >> we dont usually think of that. >> justice in the cases, the fact that you have reporters who are sometimes targeted for the work theyre doing which is distinct from simply being in a place and so-called collateral damage. >> thats right. we track the number of journalists killed and within that we also track separately the number of journalists murdered. if the journalist is murdered for their work, then what we do is we track whet...

>> what about high-speed internet? we talk about cable and a lot of people dont really care about cable anymore. they want high-speed internet, whether they watch their cable channels on that or anything else? 70% of the country, its a much bigger possible monopoly on that front than it is on cable. >> move to new york or los angeles, youd still be getting comcast internet. >> how, if youre looking at this number of 70%, how does it not get more expensive for that? >> the internet is where comca...

Comcast internet. >> how, if youre looking at this number of 70%, how does it not get more expensive for that? >> the internet is where comcast sees its future profits. thats why therell be such scrutiny on the internet piece. comcast wants to be able to charge more and more for faster and faster internet. the television is important, but the internet is even more important. netflix, "house of cards," people will be wondering if their connection will be slowed down when theyre trying to watch "h...

Of it but the actual voter databases, than we had previously seen, which is extremely concerning given that weve got another election coming up in 2018. >> right. i mean, whats clear when you listen to the testimony from today is that russia will hack another election. my question is, are we prepared to handle it? >> you know, its -- no, i think, is the answer in short. i was reminded by a former colleague in an excellent article that was written over the weekend about this is not actually new. ...

They get into the familys personal life. they get into all kinds of personal issues. this was personal attacks. >> no, it wasnt. the internet piece is not considered because the family neglected to preserve it. that is all anecdotal. it was the conduct of the church at the funeral. >> bill: i saw what was on the internet. >> that wasnt part of the case. they didnt consider what was on internet. even if they did, what the court looked at what the message was, yes, there were some attacks on priva...