Okay. So yesterday, propublicas published tape, the president reads his donors an email that the first Liberty Institute got that from Justice Thomas. I got an email from Justice Thomass Wife and i want to read that. If you guys have filled the sales of many judges, i can just tell you thank you so so much. To really understand how inappropriate that email is from the wife of a sitting Supreme Court justice, you have to understand what it is that first Liberty Institute actually does. We are the nations largest Law Firm exclusively supporting religious liberty. We recently have won four Supreme Court cases. We win over 90 percent of our cases, which is unheard of in the legal world and at the Supreme Court, the record is 9 winds wins and zero losses. That is correct and the organization that she is thinking so profusely is a Law Firm that specializes in trying to change the law by bringing cases before the Supreme Court and you know, the court where the husband of ginni thomas, Clarenc
Released a recording. The president reads supporters any email that they got from ginni thomas. I got an email today from ginni thomas, justice thomas s wife. I want to read that to you. You guys have filled the sales of many judges. Can i just tell you think, and this is all caps, thank you so so much. To really understand how inappropriate that email is from the wife of a sitting supreme court justice you have to first understand what it is that they do. We are the nation s largest law firm exclusively supporting religious liberty. We have recently won four supreme court cases. We win over 90% of our cases which is unheard of that the legal world. At the supreme court the record is nine wins and zero losses. That is correct. The organization ginni thomas was thinking so profusely the law firm that specializes in trying to change the law by bringing cases before the supreme court. That court where her husband clarence thomas is a sitting justice. Even if you don t know them by name yo
pelosi, how democrats on impeachment unified the republican party behind president trump as perhaps never before. one thing you don t hear is any reputation of the facts as they are laid out in the report and as we ve come to hear from the public hearings? right. at least not so far. we might hear more going forward and remember going into a snoot trial we have no idea what that s going to look like. certainly now they have focused on the idea that nothing turned up any connection directably to the president. there s no testimony that the president saying anything to aides. probably frankly one of those times the president is saved by the fact he doesn t use email and doesn t respond to text messages, because there s nothing in writing. that s what they focused on after the mueller report and are doing it again. i am struck by this summary that it goes over obstruction of witnesses. that s their words. democrats. that the white house locked all of these witnesses from testifying. opp
the only way it can be missing if it s affirmatively destroyed and there would be evidence of that, so they have a lot of explaining to do. shannon: a reminder, three oh twos are the eventual reports about the interview that they had with someone like general flynn in the days after he had talked with him. the hill in an opinion piece by james davidson, about altered fbi interview summaries, there is unlikely to be any revelation that will overcome his admission under oath that he did in fact live. is it your hope that you will uncover something that is such a misrepresentation of the government s case or exculpatory evidence that would change that he did admit to these things and make a plea deal. there is an excellent nation of that that s in our filings whoever wrote that story obviously hasn t read most of the brief that is so important. we know that agent strozk conducted the interview at the
different things, democrats now saying this was not thorough enough but we know the report includes 45 pages of interview summaries along with 1600 extra pages of information the fbi included coming into their tip line. they interviewed 10 different people, they reached out to 11. take us through the most important aspects of what the fbi did in this up a little background check. i have done thousands of these interviews and this is brett kavanaugh s seventh time being background check, look at 9 characteristics, his character, his associates are, his reputation in the community, his loyalties, drug abuse, his financial background, they look at 9 different areas to determine whether or not this individual is required, not required but allowed to be given