It does not get into 16. He only managed for about four months in the summer of 2016. Harris why do you think bob mueller is perched . For the reasons that this judge has said, what you only one Paul Manafort, you are only squeezing him, the judges phrase, they do not speak this way from the bench. Harris this judge has been very candid. Very colorful, you are only squeezing Paul Manafort because he want him to testify against the president. The response to that is we are lawyers and we have ethical duties. We are prosecutors. If we find evidence of crimes, we must pursue that criminality whether it is our original mission or not, that is a truthful statement of the obligation, they can pursue it themselves or pass it on and have their pursuit. Harris you are judge looking at this case, how much time could Paul Manafort face . Thats where the pressure comes in, right . He could be convicted to 60
years in jail, exposed to more, but thats what it will come down to if he is convicted of
These events. By obligation, you mean your legal obligation or did you mean something bigger . Both my legal obligation and my moral obligation. Your moral obligation. I actually want to present an alternative theory. Your family came here escaping the holocaust via uruguay. Your parents moved, lucy and later you, here. Youve done that american Success Story through dint of hard work and innovation, good idea, a knack for hiring the right people and some look, youve built up considerable, successful business, one that i know for a fact would make your parents proud. They came here because they knew that it was here that they could
have freedom that they had not enjoyed, security that they had not enjoyed, and opportunity that they had not enjoyed. No doubt on some level, youre grateful and its created a sense of patriotism in you. Is that fair to say . Very fair. Why, sir, with your courage to come before us, does that same standard not apply to mr. Mulvaney, mr. Duffy, mr. Pompeo, mr.
trial. there the defendants were being charged. so they go to trial earlier? it s can be a benefit for the trump team and meadows team and others to see paired with the evidence the persecutors putting forth? what s the theory? what are the witnesses and weaknesses on cross and then getting a game plan to actually see this evidence put forward? it s your right to demand a speedy trial and prosecutor s was your biggest fears prosecutor to have a trial started against you. a call on the prosecutors block here. a ready? let s have this over two months. georgia law before they did this because there s a mechanism for that to get that date. absolutely pick. we will see how that turns out for schneider and marcus childress, thank you very much. thank you. on and bring in former trump national security advisor informing bassett or, john bolton. investor bolton, thank you for being here tonight. mark meadows is now claiming that all of these actions that he took after the election,
have freedom that they had not enjoyed, security that they had not enjoyed, and opportunity that they had not enjoyed. no doubt on some level, you re grateful and it s created a sense of patriotism in you. is that fair to say? very fair. why, sir, with your courage to come before us, does that same standard not apply to mr. mulvaney, mr. duffy, mr. pompeo, mr. bolton, mr. giuliani. why shouldn t those same sentiments be within their hearts to do their patriotic duty and do what you have done, sir? indeed, why doesn t that same standard apply to the president of the united states? i wish i could answer. i suspect you can t because there is no good answer but i appreciate your willingness to
senator ron johnson and i also shared my concern with the ukrainians. so much for the ukrainians didn t know. you can t have a quid pro quo unless the ukrainians know, and you ve testified today, ambassador, the ukrainians knew. you further testified. mr. giuliani emphasize that the president wanted a public statement from president zelensky committing ukraine to look into corruption issues. mr. giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election, including the dnc server and burisma as to topics of importance to the president. in reference to the july 10 meeting at the white house which you attended with an investor bolton and others and the ukrainian delegation, you said i recall mentioning the