Irrep Parable Harm News Today

He acting pursuant to delegation of authority. our position is no he acting contrary to what congress has said. every single person is harmed by the order, its important to consider how much deference to give to the conserexecutive on point. >> there been order in the past that treated people based on their nation. why should that suggest to us that the statute should be harm in way other than one youre advocating. >> all of those orders are been narrower than the one here. >> if you single out ...

Or a stay is this a way to -- that affects the publics interest. >> it would go to standing because i think the harm, you could consider the other harms in the balancing public interest factor of the tests, as opposed to -- those would not become relevant. its now as this point its federal government thats asking to upset status quo. if the federal government thats asking the court to status quo again. i think -- counsel for the government repeaedtedly -- the

Motion. in the most basis for that would be the lack of irreparable harm. i heard your honor pressing the attorney for what the imreparable harm is. in fact, it was executive order itself that caused irreparable harm to our state, residents and can many other states and people that have been described in many briefs that have been filed, we believe this will not show irrep parable harm -- >> what the irreparable harm to the state of washington? >> what the executive order, well, we detail a numb...