who served for their manyeb years,od first associate deputy attorney general thenrs a deputy assistance attorney general. then special assistant to the attorney general, thenal chief of staff to theor attorneyne general, my view y generalattorne edthis department ispart destroying america, the 2024 election, violating every norm, every tradition. er. everything it inherited. it has criminalized politics, and i want to say c this, if we don t break the back of the departmentwant ofe justice. i will explainback that in a moment, it will destroy thisin country, and we won t be able to clawstro our way back, this is not hyperbole. i m not trying to be provocative. i don t need to be, we ll start. cnn. exclusive special counsel prosecutors question witnesses about chaotic oval office meeting after trump lost the 2020 election. multiple sources told cnn, stick with me, cnn, former trump campaign official cooperating in the 2020 election interference probe. sources familiar with the
talk to him some months ago about the scheme put forward by jeffrey clark who s mentioned as i think coconspirator number four. in which he was trying to get donahue and the acting attorney general, jeffrey rosen to write letters to states, specifically georgia, but also others, saying that lying that the justice department had identified serious problems with the election. i asked donahue about. that let s roll a clip of we can. a letter claimed that the u.s. department of justice has signify identified quote significant concerns it impacted the election in multiple states including the state of georgia. equate was a true? no, it would ve created chaos in the states. i think it would ve been disastrous for our country and the constitution. but was not the point of the letter tigray chaos? i think so. so this isn t the first amendment issue despite the fact the trump s lawyer was
welcome back, david shown david shown. obama biden the rest of them, the media. come out and say, well, we can t have this information and misinformation out there and so forth, and so on. which is reminiscent to me very fascistic and marxist regime that s ever existed. who decides what s disinformation and misinformation isn t the first amendment there to say have at it. let the american people figure it out. isn t freedom supposed to be the paramount issue here? you ve hit the bedrock principle and that doesn t surprise me coming from you. um absolutely. we can have government deciding what s disinformation what they think the american people shouldn t be allowed to hear and make up their minds about you know, this has been recognized the bedrock principle. from time in memorial but specifically 1919. united states versus abrams. just as holmes talked about the free trade in ideas and then in