establishment. in this case that s bob mueller, it s because steve bannon is a skruptor, it s his whole m-o. you wonder if he s looking out for the president s interests in this case. if you are president trump right now, your beth strategy is to let it play out if it will, if it takes done people like palm manafort and potentially people who are even closer into your iner circle right now. there is no benefit of the president of being aggressive with bob mueller, perhaps firing bob mueller. this is nothing for trump. so you do get the sense that bannon is pushing for more strategy. it s more in his interest because of his efforts to disrupt the sfaebment much less in the best interest of the president. you also get the impression early on, bob mueller, if he got fired, if they started talking
inside, outside game, trying to thread that needle, you know, saying to bannon, it s okay, you do what you have to do. but from inside the white house uncooperative. it s like one on your shoulder telling you what to do. right. a lot of the questions about the chief of staff s inability to compromise civil war comments. so in case you missed kelly initial comment, here you go. i think it s dangerous and shows you how much of a lack of appreciation of history and what history is. i would tell you that robert e. lee was an honorable man. man that gave up his country to fight for his state. which in 150 years ago was more important than country. he was always loyalty to state first back in those days. now it s different today. but the lack of the ability to
opportunity to drive across. we simply don t know. we don t know. the first story s always wrong and there are going to be new details that come out. the fact he has the guns, jumped out. rented a truck, he s from out beck stan. all of these things started to add up and right now it looks like islamic terrorism. maybe the islamic state. thank you all very much. in our breaking news coverage we continue with the breaking news on the terror attack and the russian probe. one of the president s lieutenant about to take the question from bob mueller s team. by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you,
can build a case against mr. clovis or whoever papadopoulos was on e-mail, and whatever his position on the trump campaign, whatever spin people want to have now, he s certainly somebody based on the court document filed he s somebody that had access to senior members of the trump campaign. ranaudo has a thread on twitter where he has gone through the different findings, and it s a must read for people that want a deeper understanding of this. i will have you do a dramatic reading of that later. george papadopoulos is not a household name he is now. he was not yesterday at this time and today he is. this is an interesting audio from well, here s a timeline of all the things he did. here s an interesting audio from march of 2016 with trump
forward in terms of collusion. well, i think this is a more significant case than potentially the case against paul manafort. i would have never expected to be saying that 48 hours ago. i don t know that i d ever heard the name papadopoulos in connection. no one had. with this case. i can barely say it. me too. but what it represents, brooke, is a second episode that meeting in june of 2016 at trump power with don junior and jared kushner and paul manafort and with russian representatives being the first, it s now the second series of events where you have trump campaign representatives who are entertaining conversations are russian who say they have dirt, what is that, dirt that came from a server. so, yes, i think it s taken a significant step forward in terms of conspiracy claim to be asserted against some of the individuals. indulge me, michael, in an