expedition. you can t say it s unfair. this is a grand jury of regular citizens that has returned this indictment. this is, you know, not something that s been drummed up by the president s political opponents. this is an investigation that s been overseen by one of the most respected prosecutors in the country, a republican, i might add, who has returned indictments and is moving forward. so ken dilanian, and we add for viewers just joining us, reports citing multiple sources of their own, was cnn. ken, this does change the tone and tenor of what we ve been covering. i think it really does, brian. and even if monday is the not the day when we see indictments in this case, almost every legal observer we talk to believes that day will come eventually. there are people i mean, when the federal government got a warrant to search paul manafort s house, his apartment in alexandria, that was a strong indication that there is
fisher investments. clearly better money management. accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right.
her story is that she got the russian prosecutor interested in this case. the point is she was in talks with people close to the kremlin, she brought that back to trump tower and handed damaging information on hillary clinton. i reviewed this information, it talks about contributions from hedge fund called the riff brothers. the point that the trump team was willing to take a meeting based on the promise of dirt is what is most significant. you talked about this being a dangle, how open the campaign would be to more contact with the russian government, correct in. absolutely. i ve said this from the beginning, there were probably multiple dirty tricks teams trying to get all this information related to hillary clinton, and russia was watching
and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it.
the investigation going forward because if people are in the orbit of one of these many prongs, whether it s potential collusion, whether it s obstruction of justice, whether it s money laundering and lobby disclosures, it might prompt some people to come forward to cooperate with the special prosecutor, which could impact how this investigation unfolds from here. and when you say it will be interesting to see what we learn from the charges, i mean, what are some of the things that potentially we could learn once we get those charges back? well, what we ll see, i expect, in any indictment is it will lay out sort of awe narrative of what they believe the crimes that were committed were, how they were committed, and potentially suggest who else was involved. part of this does depend on how much verbiage they put in the indictment, but i think that s something that a lot of people will be looking for in order to determine how the prosecutors are building their case and what sorts of e