and in direct violation of the constitution, he s taken money from foreign governments and threatened to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer and, like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet, today, people in congress and his own administration know this president is a clear and present danger who is mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it. tech: so you think this chip is nothing to worry about? well at safelite, we know sooner or later
the disposition of troops like these special forces units. so in this particular case, you ve got a drone like you said, john, that was overhead, and very quickly overhead, and that tells me that they could very easily have positioned the drone if they had known that there was a troop in contact, troops in contact type situation. the french forces, they cheerily responded, perhaps there s a way to make that response quicker, although the distances involved are very, very large. and, of course, the most important thing here is to make sure something like this does not happen again to improve don t forget those troops in contact, were very close to the enemy forces. absolutely. so getting close air support, requires a little bit of distance between our forces and theirs. we don t think they had that in this incident. that s something we ll find out. as you said the facts are what s so important here and learning is what s so important here to make sure again things like this
he s brought us to the obstructed justice at the fbi. and in direct violation of the constitution, he s taken money from foreign governments and threatened to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer and, like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet, today, people in congress and his own administration know this president is a clear and present danger who is mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it.
influence people. the president considers himself one of the great deal makers in the history of the universe. up until this point in his presidency he hasn t been able to hammer out many deals. you note the things that made him a good deal maker in the real estate community if you believe that to be the case, don t necessarily work in politics, why? president trump tends to approach negotiation like a positional bargainer, and the rules of positional bargaining are very clear. you start with an extreme demand, sometimes an outrageous demand, you concede stubbornly, and you demonstrate a greater willingness than the other side to walk away from the negotiation table. and this is classic trump doctrine around negotiation. now, it can work under certain conditions. if i m negotiating in morocco, that approach might work, but when dealing with extremely
so she had compelling evidence. but in this case, it may always be a mystery why he was willing to pay $32 million. he says this was a hit job, people were out to get them. why would you pay $32 million if it were all false accusations? i can t figure out the answer for that. i think he wants to blame the messenger, attack the media instead of taking responsibility. people pay settlements to avoid scrutiny that they believe they can t escape. that they can t prove the nonexistence of a fact. sometimes there s a reason that s practical. $32 million speaks to one of two things. one, what you re talking about, is evidence or just having such an immensely deep pocket because of the money that he has and a little bit of relative, right? if you can don t have the money, you can t pay the 32. he was able to. but the larger thing is where is bill s head at on this. he s not saying it didn t happen. he s saying that people outing him is politically motivated. and if it is, good! because t