Page 7 - It Mobility News Today

It's the principle of the thing, he just really cares about the First Amendment.

Case Overview - On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, No. 20-1573. The Court held that the rule...

Yesterday, the Supreme Court held in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (pdf) that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a California rule invalidating arbitration agreements...

On 15 June, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered the 8-1 opinion in the matter Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, which held that the California Supreme...

On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana. The Supreme Court held that California’s rule...

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued its long-anticipated opinion in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, No. 20-1573, 2022 WL 2135491 (June 15, 2022), addressing whether the Federal...

The Supreme Court of the United States is clear that a wholesale waiver of an employee’s right to bring a California’s Private Attorney General Act claim, regardless of forum, continues to be invalid and is not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.

Employers can enforce arbitration agreements in California to the extent they require an employee to arbitrate individual claims under the state’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA),...

Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana. Supreme Court held that California’s rule invalidating pre-dispute agreements waiving the right to bring representative claims under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 is partially preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act FAA.

In the latest episode of the Government Contracts Legal Round-Up, Partner David B. Robbins discusses three bid protest cases: IAP Worldwide Services