When you all set the reduction target for wisconsin it did so based on electricity production in 2012 year in which they were still operating. You are calculating your reductions the year and you had the operating with no Carbon Emissions. That facility closed and now that state and many states that have Nuclear Power i have one of the largest generating states in the country. Its now is disproportionately harmed by the rules. Extremely harmed. So the result is that wisconsin would be forced to compensate for the loss of the plan. Is that alice is all correct . This rule addresses the fossil fuel sector. It ithat is our responsibly undr 111 d. Thats where we started our job is to identify the best system of Emission Reduction for the fossil fired plants that doesnt include nuclear. Nuclear. Succumbinsuccumbing to 2012, wet the emissions in each state from their fossil generations. And we looked up with that system of Emission Reduction was from the National Basis that would result in 2
Louisiana
United-states
Alaska
Brazil
China
California
Washington
District-of-columbia
West-virginia
Mexico
India
South-carolina