Judicial Ethics Code News Today

january 6th, and attempting to overturn the last presidential election. in a sealed legal filing, donald trump is appealing a federal judges order in washington d.c. for donald trumps white house staff to testify. to jack smiths grand jury. the order, the judges order, requires donald trumps last white house chief of staff, mark meadows, to testify to the grand jury. along with donald trumps last director of national intelligence, john ratcliffe, and donald trumps last national securit...

states supreme court. we begin tonight with investigation news. the latest legal development of the day is the news that donald trump has launched another delay tactic. in special prosecutor, jack smith, federal grand jury investigation of donald trumps activities leading up to an on january 6th, and attempting to overturn the last presidential election. in a sealed legal filing, donald trump is appealing a federal judges order in washington d. c. for donald trumps white house staff to...

ill see you at the end of tomorrow. >> tonight on all in. >> reducing the irs does not make a lot of sense to me. >> ignoring ukraine, ignoring gaza, the maga conditions for aid to israel. >> making it much easier for the ultrarich to cheat on their taxes. how the heck could that be their highest priority? >> tonight, the republican plan to make billionaire tax cheats great again. plus, whats happening with hostages and the humanitarian collapse inside gaza, as the israeli invasion con...

>> ignoring ukraine, ignoring gaza, the maga conditions for aid to israel. >> making it much easier for the ultrarich to cheat on their taxes. how the heck could that be their highest priority? >> tonight, the republican plan to make billionaire tax cheats great again. plus, whats happening with hostages and the humanitarian collapse inside gaza, as the israeli invasion continues. then a day before his adult sons testify, is the indicted ex president already violating his gag order? an...

No judicial ethics code. this relates back to a congressional statute. so, theyre still under no ethics code. but more important really than being under no ethics code is that there is no process for investigating really are not there is a violation of the ethics code. so, to your questions about mrs. thomas, those are actually investigate-able things. you could begin to find out with investigators who ran the moneys through donors trust, $600,000 worth, to her group. wasnt the same donors who r...

Congress to have a code to adhere to like the judicial ethics code that the rest of the judges have to adhere to. i think thats a live effort to do that and precisely because of this flagrant behavior that people feel theres a need for that and an effort to close the loopholes. i never realized until i did this story theres a wide open loophole there where basically if a justices spouse opens a company that they can take clients who can pay an unlimited amount of money and not have to be disclos...

Colleagues would agree she should recuse herself but ive been very critical of ginsburg for years for her public statements. i was also critical of scalia a great deal. he said things publicly talking about cases and issues. >> bill: is there a case where scalia recused himself because of that? >> the thing people dont really get. the justices dont fall under the judicial ethics code. it is completely voluntary and something that i argued for years should change. the justices position is were su...