Latest Breaking News On - Justice department hasn t - Page 1 : vimarsana.com
in his impeachment trial, he wasn't convicted. justice department hasn't brought that charge, so who decides whether he has committed insurrection in me? you? if a single justice official in? michigan said otherwise. governor newsom said we're not doing that here in california. so what's being created is this untenable patchwork of rules as we approach this 2024 election, and that's why the supreme court has to get involved. and how they choose to go about it is going to be very interesting. howard: well, it's not me or you, but we do talk. [laughter] have "the new york times" or washington post editorial boards taken the stand against barring colorado and maine voters for voting for the are republican front-runner? >> i hadn't seen that, "the washington post" mantra democracy dies in darkness, yet i think everyone whether they want to say it out loud or not knows we are barreling towards the chaos. if what has happened remains the way it is. because when we remove the right
i find it hard otherwise to explain why almost two years from the events of january 6th and with the evidence that's already in the public domain, why the justice department hasn't moved more quickly than it has. >> i want to turn to another topic. right now, as you know, it's the end of the year and there are all these efforts to bring legislation that has not been brought to the floor of the senator the house for a vote and put it in the only bus bill including antitrust legislation in the only bus to rein in the behaviors of companies, big tech, google, apple, amazon, that hurt smaller companies. it seems from the reporting i've been able to do that some of the obstacles to this happening, even a vote on it in the senate are democratic leader chuck schumer and a bunch democrats from your home state of california, not you, but other california democrats. i have to say i'm surprised. i know these big tech companies
i find it hard otherwise to explain why almost two years from the events of january 6th and with the evidence that's already in the public domain, why the justice department hasn't moved more quickly than it has. >> i want to turn to another topic. right now, as you know, it's the end of the year and there are all these efforts to bring legislation that has not been brought to the floor of the senate or the house for a vote and put it in the omnibus bill, including antitrust legislation in the only bus to rein in the behaviors of companies, big tech, google, apple, amazon, that hurt smaller companies. it seems from the reporting i've been able to do that some of the obstacles to this happening, even a vote on it in the senate are democratic leader chuck schumer, and a bunch of house democrats from your home state of california -- not you, but other california democrats.
handled as though it were something undertaken by doj. >> absolutely. tim is a former u.s. attorney himself. he has more than a dozen former federal prosecutors working under him. i assume that these transcripts and these depositions have been done and in full compliance with sort of how doj would do them. so, i do think there's some -- there should be a seamless transfer here. that said, we're told justice department hasn't gotten these transcripts yet. they have been asking for them for a number of weeks, so you know, i'm not exactly sure what the hold-up is with that. but it potentially is just a matter of, you know, just so much -- so much voluminous paperwork to go through and transfer things over. but you know, from the start, these two committees have been working or these two investigations have been kept separate. >> right. >> the house has not been sharing their information with
swore that race had no influence on his trigger. >> if michael brown were white, this would have gone down the same way? >> yes. >> no question? >> no question. >> reporter: the justice department hasn't yet decided if it will file federal charges against officer wilson. despite this new report, every indication that they won't. steve osunsami, abc news, atlanta. let's turn to hillary clinton now. she spoke at a political gala last night without mentioning the growing controversy surrounding her. clinton is under fire for using her personal e-mail instead of official account from the state department while she was secretary of state. she did not address that controversy during her speech but did hint at a presidential run. republicans say she skirted federal rules. clinton turned over 55,000 pages of e-mails in december at the state department's request. it has been almost two years since the attack on the boston marathon. today begins the trial of 21-year-old dzhokhar tsarnaev. >> more than half of the charges he's facing carry the possibility of a death penalty. abc's marci gonzalez with the latest details from boston.