at these grown men that are behaving in such a ridiculous way. but it is also deadly serious. and it should be called out for what it is, dangerous. we must demand more of our leaders. and on that note, i wish you a peaceful and a good night. from all of our colleagues across the networks of nbc news, thank you for staying up late. see you again tomorrow. it is easy to become desensitized to the litany of outrageous things that donald trump has said over the years. but there is a reason that historians are concerned about mr. trump s latest stump speech. we pledge to you that we will root out the communists, marxists, fastest s, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country. the threat from outside forces is far less sinister, dangerous, and grave none the threat from within the. calling your political opponents vermin and the threat from within, we ve heard that before. in mine collins, adolf hitler referred to jews as vermin
we pledge to you that we will wow the communists, marxists, fascists and the radical left dogs that live like vermin within the confines of our country. data from outside forces is far less sinister, dangerous and grave than the threat from within. calling your political opponents vermin and the threat from within, we ve heard that before. in mein kampf, adolf hitler referred to jews as vermin, worthy of eradication, and benito miscellany would ve referred to his opponents as parasites and reptiles. so, donald trump is following in some appalling and tories footsteps of the most violent, dangerous man of the 20th century, or at least some of them. trump did not end there. here he was in the same stump speech, talking about the home invasion and the brutal attack on speaker nancy pelosi s has been, and attack carried out by a right-wing extremists. nancy pelosi, who is a crazed lunatic. [applause] she s a lunatic. she is a crazed lunatic, what the hell was going on with
judge chutkan might rule on this? i think those are very different questions. the rules and federal courts are clear. cameras are prohibited. media groups have come in and they have argued a couple of different things, and one is that the rule is unconstitutional, that it violates first amendment rights so judge chutkan should set it aside. the other is a technical argument about the nature of broadcast which says that this can be done in a way that wouldn t violate the rule. i think it s unlikely that judge chutkan would go ahead and alter the long-standing practice in federal court, but that s very unfortunate because this is a case that should be put on television so that everyone can see it as it happens. the real problem is that donald trump s response in this case, this sort of last-minute response that he files, saying they jacks mitt is engaging in a show trial that he wants to conduct under cover of darkness, is really nothing other than theater because that is sim