your lifestyle that would be what i would consider the ideal function where the individuals changed their lifestyle rather than turning to lifestyle drugs. heather: they want the shortcut. gregg:ç you see addiction to cosmetic surgeries. a lot of people go to the doctor and say you see that little mole and they say what mole? and then they want their nose changed and eyes changed. there s always a risk. but it is driven by the public and the medical profession and pharmaceutical industry will meet those needs. heather: a lot of these drugs beginç to be used off market like botox and latisse. now it makes eyelashes longer. the public can demand a quality of life product. nothing necessarily wrong with that. an issue of balance and who is paying for it. heather: what about the side effects? can you imagine if i said we can change your eye color
to what extent are the truck companies trying to get rich selling female aphrodisiac in a pill as opposed to trying to cure cancer. that s a good question. you look back to deregulation in the 90s when all of a sudden pharmaceutical companies were allowed to ties on television. now we know our culture is proliferated with ads. we and new zealand are the only countries in the world that allow direct advertising from pharmaceuticals. it created this whole way pharmaceutical companies could market to people. they realized lifestyle drugs were the thing they could make most money on and convince people they would like to have. like selling a car, if you get this car, you ll be happy. good times. people are going to go to their doctor and ask for those drugs. who doesn t want a good time. unfortunately facilitator