Page 381 - Limitations News Today

President in the courthouse. it will be a mad house tomorrow morning. the people will pay the price of the taxpayers because it will cost $10 million to get the president down there what appears to be $130,000 issue. >> todd: the liver you get manhattan, that is sure logistical nightmare right there. as to the law you heard in brooke piece, check a peanut, they will file a motion to dismiss as soon as they can review the indictment. based upon what we know right now, should that motion to dismis...

Theres the issue of michael cohens testimony, and theres the issue of the statute of limitations, whereas, if you were the prosecutor, which one of those three hurdles would you see to be the highest? >> well, i think this is obviously a case of great consequence and a case thats never happened before. so its novel in and of itself i think theres -- i think if im guessing about the presidents strategy -- and its only a guess, and hell have excellent lawyers, is that theyll take a run at the law ...

Little while ago, getting ready to leave with the motorcade. >> kayleigh: he has his attorneys, none of whom i know personally. i know some folks were still on his campaign. what i would say, having had a relationship -- of course, my former boss, with this person. this is someone who loves this country. this is someone who always when i signed the decision-making during a global pandemic that we had not seen on our hands but the american people first. he loves this country. he did not have to d...

Judge can easily say i dont get motions to dismiss. lets see what the evidence is. if i believe the statute of limitations or otherwise has been violated, then i will dismiss it at that point. but he could very well punt that issue and wait to see what the government has to present. >> harris: i never used to wonder about this sort of thing but it is like everything is politicized now. what does it matter about what we learn about the judge in this case? >> yeah, it is difficult to put into word...

Attorney joe tacopina was on state of the union yesterday. take a listen to what he had to say. we will take the indictment . we will dissect it. um, the team will look at every every, um, potential issue that we will be able to challenge them. we will challenge and of course, i very much anticipated motion to dismiss coming because theres no law that fits this. pena also signaling that they could challenge the statute of limitations and ask why trump is being charged with this crime with a regu...

Officer into pleading guilty by inf indeferentially taking a guilty plea a defendant cannot be saying these things to try to poison the jury pool that will sit in judgment of him, donald trump. so i think this is what were going hear a lot of discussion about in court tomorrow, the first legal battle that will be waged. >> glenn, according to our sources, that the former president has said that publicly, that after he goes to manhattan and is arraigned, indicted and goes through the process, he ...

Very few rules or restrictions on who can be president. maybe 35 years old and you have to be a natural born citizen of the united states has to be a he pardon me. thats very thank you for correcting me on that he or she needs to be 35 years old or a natural born citizen of the united states. theres nothing in the constitution about but someone who has been charged with a crime or someone who has been convicted of a crime being barred from serving or running for president, united states now if y...

Related to special counsel jack smith probe into the handling of classified documents. comes as a new report in "the washinton post" says the department of justice may have more evidence against the former president and his team, including mr. trump may have personally looked through boxes of documents after being subpoenaed by the government. >> gillian: john, legal analysts across the channel have been telling us for several weeks of the two investigations they perceive the one you just laid o...

These prosecutors have, and then were going to try to see what theyve developed that perhaps federal prosecutors didnt have when they decided not to pursue this case and why it is that they believe they can bring this case seven years later, right? so those are the things were looking for. were looking to see what other possible evidence they have, perhaps, of other hush money payments. those are things that obviously have been have been discussed. and then well see what trump and his legal team...

Dont know exactly what the charges are. of course, thats going to impact any defense arguments, but jake for hypothetical sake, lets say it is this misdemeanor falsification of business records charge combined with an accentuated to a felony, because its to cover up another crime and that other crime being ah, violations of campaign finance law. i think theres a lot of defenses that are going to come because thats a very novel legal theory in new york. first i would expect challenges on the stat...