Page 494 - Limitations News Today

>> and he threatened to withhold the very weapons that ukraine is using right now, he obviously tried to undermine nato repeatedly, while president putin, his relationship we know, and president zelenskyy and his body language and how uncomfortable he was with this. and it is interesting to watch. do you suspect trump could still see fallout from that investigation? we think so much of the second impeachment over january 6th but this one is still very pertinent to that. >> its difficult to asses...

Taking this missionary zeal to say, we are going to set aside the problems that american people are facing and focus on saving the world by spreading democracy everywhere. its a bigger version of obamas taking his attitude to save the middle east by spreading democracy but left destruction, suffering and death in his wake and the american people paid a heavy price for that. >> jesse: its about humility and recognizing that the american president cant just shape the world however he wants. part b...

Quieter over the last five years because of the effect donald trump has had on the party. but i think seeing people pulling back on that. it is being exposed for what it is, which is a button being push that had has echos of white national i. the way putin has run russia with white christians. that is extremely unsavery. it goes against everything the republican party stood for for three decades before that. so i do think this ad is extremely interesting for that reason and it is a really test. ...

Defended her record as a federal judge and public defender today as she faced intense questioning. cbs chief legal correspondent jan crawford has more from capitol hill. >> my judicial philosophy is to rule impartially and to rule consistent with the limitations on my authority as a judge. >> you wouldnt say that youre an activist judge. >> i would not say that. >> reporter: on the first day of questioning, senatorsex fod on how judge ketanji brown jackson would rule as a justice. >> what do you...

Denouncing the war. thats an indicator that putin does not have a lot of support for the conflict, even despital of his brainwashing and attempts to crack down on independent information. granted most russians probably dont know whats really going on in ukraine, but i think putin is so concerned to crack down on dissent and crack down on information because hes worried about what russians will say if they knew what was being done in their name. i just think that theres a statute of limitations o...

Limited in what i can say about them. im aware there are cases -- >> im not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide in the future. im asking isnt it apparent that when the supreme court decided something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme courts edict, particularly in an area where people have sincerely held religious believes, doesnt that effect their religious doctrine or faith and what t...

Authority to an agency may still be subject to congresss other directions regarding how to exercise the discretion. >> that argument fell on deaf ears. >> understood. thats our appellate process. >> you have an given an explanation but it didnt work. the d.c. circuit court said there could hardly be a -- this is as good as it gets. there is no way to write a statute saying discretion lies in an agency. the sole none reviewable. so you are not convincing me that this was anything other than activ...

Im going to be out front. thats the kind of person my brother is. its the kind of service that our family provides and for me what that meant was an understanding that to defend our country and its values, we also needed to make sure that when we responded as a country to the terrible attacks on 9/11, we were upholding our constitutional values. that we werent allowing the terrorists to win by changing who we are. and so i joined with many lawyers during that time who were helping the courts fig...

That there are limitations on regulation, even if people are regulating pursuant to theirs sincerely held religious belief. >> do you agree that a marriage is not mentioned in the constitution? >> it is not mentioned, no. >> and religious freedom is mentioned in the first amendment explicitly, correct? >> it is. >> do you share my concern that when the court takes on the role of identifying in on enumerated right, in other words it is not mentioned in the constitution, and creates a new right, d...

To rule consistent with the limitations on my authority as a judge. and so my methodology actually helps me to do that in every case. >> you wouldnt say that you are an activist judge. >> i would not say that. >> okay. so well have a 20 minutes more later on. here is what i would say. that every group that wants to pack the court that believes this court is a bunch of right wing nuts who are going to destroy america, that consider the constitution trash, all wanted you picked. and this is all i ...