was just talking about this with raf, when he sees someone like prigozhin, now, as treasonous? well, there s a lot to unpack. there i think as he said many times, over the last few minutes, there s a lot we don t, know which is important for people to remember. we don t know what the terms of this quote unquote deal are. we don t know if this, in prigozhin s, mind is act, one where he has other plans. there are a number of things here, which has stuck out to, me which don t quite make sense. prigozhin has been a critic of how the war has been fought, the tactics, the lack of military resources and assets to his trained mercenaries that he has been fighting alongside the russian military for the past year plus. he has been critical of that for several months, telegram, a range of. with new, in terms of last, night questioning the strategy
editor-in-chief at just the news.com. thank you. let s give a warm welcome to cohost of the hit show the five. judge jeanine pirro. attorney general matthew whitaker. great to see you both. by the way, the judge has a new book out crimes against america. the left s takedown of the republic. they have it right there. thank you. we have got a lot to unpack. i agree. john s revelation we will see tomorrow. the fact that durham had all this information today sticks in my craw. we knew this and we knew that there was one thing they could corroborate in the dossier and that became the basis for the bye warns pre-signed by jim comey and he is writing books about a higher honor? i don t think so. jim comey is one of the reasons that this country was split apart.
evidence that mr. trump s statement was defamatory? yes. did miss carroll prove by clear and convincing evidence that mr. trump s statement was false? yes. did she prove that trump made the statement with actual malice? yes. was miss carroll injured as a result of mr. trump s statement? yes. did mr. trump act maliciously out of hatred, ill will, despite, or reckless, or willful disregard of the rights of another? yes. and then the jury lists three more dollar amounts for damages. 1 million, 1.7 million, and $280,000. for those of you doing the math at home, that brings trump stab here up to $5 million. trump s lawyer has vowed to appeal the verdict but today, clearly a landmark moment in american history. so what does all of this mean that, what does it mean for trump s future, what does it mean legally, what does it mean culturally? we have a lot to unpack.
million, and $280,000. for those of you doing the math at home, that brings trump s tab here up to $5 million. trump s lawyer has vowed to appeal the verdict but today, clearly a landmark moment in american history. so what does all of this mean now? what does it mean for trump s future, what does it mean legally, what does it mean culturally? we have a lot to unpack. joining us now is lisa rubin, msnbc legal analyst who has been watching this trial from the start, and rebecca, writer at large for new york magazine. thank you both for joining me on this very big day. lisa, you ve been there through it all, and i ve got to say, when you are the lawyer for a defendant and you have to say, it didn t get him on the right thing, that seems like a thin defense given everything else that they got him on.
is clearly a landmark moment in american history, so what does all of this mean now? what does it mean for trump s future? what does it mean legally? what does it mean culturally? we have a lot to unpack. joining us now is lisa rubin. thanks for joining me on this very, very big day. lisa, you ve been through it all, andve i ve got to say when you re a lawyert for a defenda and you have to say they didn t get him on the rape thing, that seems like a thin defense given everything else they got him on. otyes, it is a very thin defense. and he knows what the impact of this liability finding is because even though it s not a criminal trial joe tacopina in his closing saidop to the jury not condemn this man as a rapist. in other words, he understood full well while this is a civil trial the impact of the finding