Loyalty Demand News Today

Say this is a deal breaker for me? im not going to support the president. im talking about president trump supporters. at what point are we going to be like enough is enough? calling a black woman a dog is my line. >> theres no line. >> there needs to be a line. >> one other thing, two things in terms of the mueller investigation that could be interesting. in her book she write it is firing was all about comeys rejection of trumps loyalty demand. i never thought he would go through with it. that...

Activities. if its unclassified to get in open session. i dont know if any legal or traditional basis for them with holding this information from the committee today. >> i appreciate all of you hanging out with us tonight. thank you so much. to robert kosta, to ashley parker, to jeremy bash. i want to show you an l.a. times headline that william randolph hurst himself would look back on and perhaps be happy with. thats how the "l.a. times" is portraying it. trumps loyalty demand.

Thank you so much. to robert kosta, to ashley parker, to jeremy bash. i want to show you an l.a. times headline that william randolph hurst himself would look back on and perhaps be happy with. we have it, i swear we have it. i just saw it. anyway, well come back. there it is. thats how the l.a. times are portraying tomorrows testimony. trumps loyalty demand. a viewerss guide. hey ron! theyre finally taking down that schwab billboard. oh, not so fast, carl. ♪ oh no. schwab, again? index invest...

Traditional basis for them with holding this information from the committee today. >> i appreciate all of you hangint with us tonight. thank you so much. to robert kosta, to ashley parker, jeremy bash. i want to show you an l.a. times headline that william randolph hurst himself would look back on and perhaps be happy with. we have it, i swear we have it. i just saw it. anyway, well come back. there it is. thats how the l.a. times are portraying tomorrows testimony. trumps loyalty demand. a view...

You respond to that? >> well, i agree with jeff. i will say that if that were the only conversation, as troubling as it is, if there had been no firing at the end of this, no loyalty demand at the beginning of it. if you didnt have a whole pattern, youd have a legal argument that trump has the constitutional right to direct investigations but the pattern is what takes it out of the argument which youre hearing from commentators about trumps right to direct comey. the pattern takes it out of that...

There is a there there in terms of unseemly financial interactions between trump associates, trump himself and russia there is a group that could find it ands in the group. turn over the records and the committees and the fbi will see where that information leads. >> and we should point out it doesnt mean there is a there there. it just means this is the committee that would find it if there was. >> exactly right. and they are in effect fezing up. providing documents if there are documents that ...