Magic Telescope News Today

reality. then, from potential, national security concerns to possible chomskys a trump grill. chuck rosenberg on what is missing from classified folders found at mar-a-lago. and he was among the very few people in the room where it happened. what >> i saw general flynn, i saw sydney powell. the overstock person, ive never met him. >> but we know about what pat cipollone told the grand jury investigating january six today. when "all in" starts right now. >> good evening from new york, i...

Compelling argument. >> in a fraud case, or an obstruction case it all turns on the defendants state of mind. did the defendant have the intent to commit fraud? can you pierces mind to know what his attempt was? we all know trump fired mother or but did he do it for a corpus or not? there have been a lot of debates on this program and elsewhere trying to figure out proof of trumps state of mind and in for, but we dont have a magic telescope. drug case is very simple, if you have an ounce of hero...

General for basically doing what he had to do. he was required to do under the rules of the justice department. >> renado i have to ask you, when youre dealing with obstruction, im not an attorney but thats what i hear from the attorneys and legal folks here, you have to establish intent correct? what is the intent? and im wondering if the presidents tweets, what he said is that going to come into play when theyre trying to figure out what his intent was behindfully of these meetings and questio...

Investigation. the way you prove as a from t prosecutor, somebodys intent, you dont have a magic telescope that sees inside their brain. you look at their words and actions over a long period of time and you ask a jury to form conclusions about the persons intent from those words and actions. so, for example, why was the president so angry at jeff sessions for doing what he was legally required to do by recusing himself? why did he talk about the attorney general protecting him? why did he fire ...

It talks about if there is no slam dunk piece of evidence in a particular obstruction case and they often search for a larger pattern of behavior, how would the tweets fit in? >> sure. so its very hard in a case involving intent. a white collar case where its not like somebody robbed a bank or did -- or murdered somebody. >> has a crowbar. >> yeah. exactly. a pattern of behavior and youre trying to prove did this person have the intent to obstruct justice. you almost always will be looking at a ...

It in term whafts he disclosed to the russians. would that be something an investigator would want to learn more about? >> i dont think in this context. in a counterintelligence investigation, it might be interesting. and i think potentially i suppose it may go to his -- to show his state of mind regarding a predilection to do favors for the russians. i think that that would be something that they would look at maybe to show that. but i think the primary interest in this meeting is the one that ...